Grouping students in educational settings

Given a class of large number of students, each exhibiting a different ability level, how can we group them into sections so that the overall gain for students is maximized? This question has been a topic of central concern and debate amongst social scientists and policy makers for a long time. We propose a framework for rigorously studying this question, taking a computational perspective. We present a formal definition of the grouping problem and investigate some of its variants. Such variants are determined by the desired number of groups as well as the definition of the gain for each student in the group. We focus on two natural instantiations of the gain function and we show that for both of them the problem of identifying a single group of students that maximizes the gain among its members can be solved in polynomial time. The corresponding partitioning problem, where the goal is to partition the students into non-overlapping groups appear to be much harder. However, the algorithms for the single-group version can be leveraged for solving the more complex partitioning problem. Our experiments with generated data coming from different distributions demonstrate that our algorithm is significantly better than the current strategies in vogue for dividing students in a class into sections.

[1]  Cheng-Te Li,et al.  Team Formation for Generalized Tasks in Expertise Social Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[2]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Principles of Data Mining , 2001, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science.

[3]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[4]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning , 1993 .

[5]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Bonnie Grossen,et al.  How Should We Group To Achieve Excellence with Equity , 1996 .

[7]  Stephen Richer,et al.  Reference-Group Theory and Ability Grouping: A Convergence of Sociological Theory and Educational Research. , 1976 .

[8]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Online team formation in social networks , 2012, WWW.

[9]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Principles of Data Mining by David J. Hand, Heikki Mannila and Padhraic Smyth, MIT Press, 546 pp., £34.50, ISBN 0-262-08290-X , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[10]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[11]  James M. McPartland,et al.  School Structures and Classroom Practices in Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Schools. Report No. 14. , 1987 .

[12]  R. Hambleton,et al.  An NCME Instructional Module on Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development. , 2005 .

[13]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[14]  Theodoros Lappas,et al.  Finding a team of experts in social networks , 2009, KDD.

[15]  Samik Datta,et al.  Capacitated team formation problem on social networks , 2012, KDD.

[16]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Power in unity: forming teams in large-scale community systems , 2010, CIKM.

[17]  Dylan Wiliam,et al.  Students' Experiences of Ability Grouping—disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure† , 2000 .

[18]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[19]  J. Chimombo Issues in Basic Education in Developing Countries: An Exploration of Policy Options for Improved Delivery , 2005 .

[20]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  A Social Matching Approach to Support Team Configuration , 2009, CRIWG.

[21]  Niels Anthonisen,et al.  On Learning to Cooperate , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  J. Gillies,et al.  Opportunity to Learn: A High Impact Strategy for Improving Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries. Working Paper. , 2008 .

[23]  Atish Das Sarma,et al.  Multi-skill Collaborative Teams based on Densest Subgraphs , 2011, SDM.

[24]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[25]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[26]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Role of Education Quality for Economic Growth , 2007 .

[27]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Item Response Models for Grouped Data , 1983 .

[28]  R. Clark,et al.  Competition and Cooperation , 2004 .

[29]  Robyn M. Gillies,et al.  Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups , 2003 .

[30]  N. Webb Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[31]  James A. Kulik,et al.  An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Research-Based Decision Making Series. , 1992 .