Progress in the development of a synthetic corneal onlay.

PURPOSE This study evaluated an improved perfluoropolyether polymer formulation designed for use as a corneal onlay to correct refractive error. METHODS Collagen I coated perfluoropolyether lenticules were implanted in feline corneas exposing a 6-mm diameter area of lenticule surface for epithelial growth. A parallel series of sham-wounded corneas were also studied. All corneas were monitored clinically for 4 or 8 weeks after surgery when animals were terminated and corneas used for histology with light and electron microscopy. RESULTS Postoperative epithelial growth began on days 1 and 2. Lenticule surfaces were fully epithelialized by days 5 to 11. Corneas remained clear, and the lenticules maintained epithelial cover until the designated time points. Histology of the implanted corneas showed that the lenticules were well tolerated by the cornea. Each lenticule was fully covered by a multilayered epithelium with microvilli, desmosomes, and a differentiated basal cell layer. Epithelial adhesive structures (basal lamina, hemidesmosomes, and anchoring fibrils) had assembled at the tissue-lenticule interface. CONCLUSIONS Collagen coated perfluoropolyether lenticules implanted in the feline cornea supported the growth of a stable stratified squamous epithelium. These encouraging results are a step further in the development of a corneal onlay for correction of refractive error.

[1]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Epithelialization of a synthetic polymer in the feline cornea: a preliminary study. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Effects of biologically modified surfaces of synthetic lenticules on corneal epithelialization in vivo. , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  Marguerite B. McDonald,et al.  The Future Direction of Refractive Surgery , 1988 .

[4]  M. D. Evans,et al.  Persistent adhesion of corneal epithelial tissue on synthetic lenticules in vivo. , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  I. Constable,et al.  Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Maloney,et al.  Microkeratome complications of laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Lass,et al.  Epikeratoplasty. The surgical correction of aphakia, myopia, and keratoconus. , 1987, Ophthalmology.

[8]  M. Lawless,et al.  Epithelial ingrowth: causes, prevention, and treatment in 5 cases , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  G. Meijs,et al.  New porous perfluoropolyether membranes , 2001 .

[10]  J. Funderburgh,et al.  Clinical and histopathologic changes in the host cornea after epikeratoplasty for keratoconus. , 1992, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  G O Waring,et al.  Current status of synthetic epikeratoplasty. , 1991, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[12]  R. Beuerman,et al.  Assessment of the long‐term corneal response to hydrogel intrastromal lenses implanted in monkey eyes for up to five years , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  P. Asbell,et al.  Two-year outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments for the correction of myopia. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[14]  R. Lindstrom,et al.  LASIK Complications , 2000, International ophthalmology clinics.

[15]  B. Holden,et al.  Nutritional requirements of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma: clinical findings. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  I. Gipson,et al.  Synthetic Epikeratoplasty in Rhesus Monkeys with Human Type IV Collagen , 1993, Cornea.

[17]  G. Grabner,et al.  Confocal microscopy after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Aquavella,et al.  Specular microscopy of corneal epithelium after epikeratophakia. , 1987, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  N. Iskander,et al.  Postoperative complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2000, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Raizman,et al.  In vivo evaluation of a collagen corneal allograft derived from rabbit dermis. , 1995, Journal of refractive surgery.

[21]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  H. Griesser,et al.  Surface Immobilization of Synthetic Proteins Via Plasma Polymer Interlayers , 1998 .

[23]  R. Evershed,et al.  Mat Res Soc Symp Proc , 1995 .

[24]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Histological study of epikeratophakia in primates. , 1984, Ophthalmic surgery.

[25]  H. Kruth,et al.  Lipid deposits posterior to impermeable intracorneal lenses in rhesus monkeys: clinical, histochemical, and ultrastructural studies. , 1990, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[26]  V. Trinkaus-Randall,et al.  Progress in the development of a synthetic cornea , 1994, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[27]  V. Trinkaus-Randall,et al.  Implantation of a synthetic cornea: design, development and biological response. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[28]  V. Trinkaus-Randall,et al.  Plasma surface modification of artificial corneas for optimal epithelialization. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  I. Gipson,et al.  Reassembly of the anchoring structures of the corneal epithelium during wound repair in the rabbit. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  B. McCarey,et al.  Intrastromal Crystalline Deposits Following Hydrogel Keratophakia in Monkeys , 1993, Cornea.

[31]  I. Gipson,et al.  Anchoring fibrils form a complex network in human and rabbit cornea. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  M. Taravella,et al.  Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[33]  I. Gipson,et al.  Hemidesmosomes and anchoring fibril collagen appear synchronously during development and wound healing. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[34]  J M Legeais,et al.  A second generation of artificial cornea (Biokpro II). , 1998, Biomaterials.