Evaluating web sites: exploiting user's expectations

A new goal-based approach to measure usability of web sites is presented, strongly taking into account the customer's expectations, which are often hardly foreseeable as a whole. After a general discussion on web site design issues, we present a short survey of evaluation methods currently used for web sites. We next introduce a new taxonomy of site categories in a three-dimensional space, derived from Aristotle's rhetorical triangle, including different aspects of the site designer's goals. In our approach, we use this taxonomy to identify a number of sites belonging to the same category, in order to carry out a comparative analysis of their features. This analysis is the basis for a two-shot generation of a form for the evaluation of that category of sites. In the first shot, the users fill a generic evaluation form, acquainting them with sites characteristics. They are next asked to perform specific tasks of their choice, according to what they expect from a site of the given category. They note their impressions and list those features they found useful; the analysis of their comments is exploited to formulate statements specific to the given category, to be added to the initial form (second shot). We found that the responses to the second, expanded form, provide more comprehensive criteria for site evaluation, and turn helpful to precisely locate flaws in site functionalities. After testing, our methodology has proved very promising and may be applied for the evaluation of any other site category, most of all those providing a set of special services.

[1]  Russell Greiner,et al.  Efficient reasoning , 2001, CSUR.

[2]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[3]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  Aaron Marcus User-interface design, culture, and the future , 2002, AVI '02.

[5]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C DRAFT Proposed Recommendation , 1999 .

[6]  Luisa Mich,et al.  Evaluating and designing Web site quality , 2003 .

[7]  Rosalind W. Picard Affective Computing , 1997 .

[8]  Jennifer Fleming,et al.  Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience , 1998 .

[9]  Gary Perlman,et al.  Practical usability evaluation , 1994, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Stanley L. Payne,et al.  The Art of Asking Questions , 1951 .

[11]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  A proposed index of usability: A method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[13]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  Information Design , 2000 .

[14]  R. Fairlie The alertbox: Current issues in web usability , 2000 .

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[16]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Cognition: Theory and Applications , 1982 .

[17]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[19]  Carolyn Snyder,et al.  Web sites that work: designing with your eyes open , 1998, CHI EA '99.

[20]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  What did they do? understanding clickstreams with the WebQuilt visualization system , 2002, AVI '02.

[21]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Paul Kline,et al.  A Handbook of Test Construction : Introduction to Psychometric Design , 1987 .

[23]  Michel Hersen,et al.  Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment , 2004 .

[24]  Joel Sklar Principles of Web Design , 2000 .

[25]  Steve Draper,et al.  Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool , 1983, CHI '83.

[26]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Remote automatic evaluation of web sites based on task models and browser monitoring , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[27]  Wendy Chisholm Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 , 1999 .

[28]  Frederick G. Conrad,et al.  Usability testing of world wide web sites , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[30]  Fabio Paternò Model-Based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications , 2000 .

[31]  Y. Aharoni Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[32]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[33]  G. Katona,et al.  The Art of Asking Questions , 1951 .

[34]  R LewisJames IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires , 1995 .

[35]  A.J. Murphy,et al.  Web pages that suck: learn good design by looking at bad design [Book Reviews] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[36]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[37]  Brian M. Stecher,et al.  How to focus an evaluation , 1987 .

[38]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[39]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site , 2000, CHI.