Are we talking about the task or the computer? An examination of the associated domains of task-specific and computer self-efficacies

Much research has investigated computer self-efficacy. Despite these efforts, the relation between efficacy beliefs concerning the task being performed on the computer and beliefs dealing with the computer application remains overlooked. In this study, we apply associationism to show how task-specific self-efficacy beliefs (TSE) positively influence computer-specific self-efficacy (CSE) judgments. We also show that this relation might be more complex than first thought: the degree of match between the novelty of the task and the novelty the application moderates this relation. That is, when both the task and the application are novel (or not), the influence of TSE on CSE is greater than when one is novel and the other is not. Furthermore, we show that CSE positively influences perceptions of usefulness, and as such, CSE represents one of the building blocks of the formation of beliefs about computer applications. Finally, several implications for practice and future research are discussed.

[1]  R. C. Honey,et al.  The role of similarity in human associative learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Nathaniel J. Blair,et al.  Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: a cross-cultural study. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Effect of relative stimulus validity: learning or performance deficit? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[13]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Job Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics. , 2006 .

[14]  Harald Lachnit.  The Principle of Contiguity , 2003 .

[15]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[16]  Qingxiong Ma,et al.  The Role of Internet Self-Efficacy in the Acceptance of Web-Based Electronic Medical Records , 2005, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[17]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[19]  Jennifer Connolly,et al.  Social self-efficacy in adolescence: relations with self-concept, social adjustment, and mental health , 1989 .

[20]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[21]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[22]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[23]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Supporting Articulation Work , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[24]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[25]  Christy M. K. Cheung,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intentions: The Case of IS Continuance , 2007 .

[26]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy - performance relationship , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  H. O'Neil,et al.  Effects of expertise on state self-efficacy and state worry during a computer-based certification test☆ , 1999 .

[29]  D. Manson,et al.  A STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY AND PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF THE EMPOWERED DESKTOP INFORMATION SYSTEM , 1997 .

[30]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Donald A. Dewsbury.  Contemporary Animal Learning Theory: Problems in the Behavioural Sciences. , 1981 .

[32]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  Memory Organization and Structure , 1979 .

[33]  Denise Potosky,et al.  A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[35]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  Divergent Effects Of Job Control On Coping With Work Stressors: The Key Role Of Self-Efficacy , 1997 .

[36]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social foundation of thoughts and actions: A social cognitive theory , 1986 .

[38]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  A Comparative Study of How Experts and Novices Use a Decision Aid to Solve Problems in Complex Knowledge Domains , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  J. Pearce,et al.  The effects of pre-exposure on escape from a Morris pool , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[41]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[42]  R. Frank Falk,et al.  A Primer for Soft Modeling , 1992 .

[43]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. , 2002, JAMA.

[44]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[45]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Chaelynne M. Wolak.  Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement , 2000 .

[47]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[48]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[49]  Jeffery D. Wilfong.  Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Diane Hamilton,et al.  Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[52]  E. Tulving.  Concepts of memory. , 2000 .

[53]  Siegfried Macho,et al.  Recursive retrospective revaluation of causal judgments. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Conceptual Versus Procedural Software Training for Graphical User Interfaces: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1994, MIS Q..

[55]  Maria Isabel Beas,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs, computer training and psychological well-being among information and communication technology workers , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[57]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[58]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  D. Cervone,et al.  Generalization effects of coping-skills training: influence of self-defense training on women's efficacy beliefs, assertiveness, and aggression. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[60]  D. Dillman,et al.  How to conduct your own survey , 1994 .

[61]  Jose Prados,et al.  Active preexposure enhances attention to the landmarks surrounding a Morris swimming pool. , 1999 .

[62]  S. Klein,et al.  Handbook of contemporary learning theories , 2000 .

[63]  David S. Bushnell,et al.  Input, process, output: a model for evaluating training , 1990 .

[64]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[65]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[66]  J. Pearce,et al.  Theories of associative learning in animals. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[67]  W. Estes.  Toward a Statistical Theory of Learning. , 1994 .

[68]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning , 1971 .

[69]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  C. Bova,et al.  Experimental and quasiexperimental designs , 2002 .

[71]  Alvin Y. Wang,et al.  Predictors of web-student performance: the role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an on-line class , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[72]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[73]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Learning second and subsequent programming languages: A problem of transfer , 1990, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[74]  M MarakasGeorge,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy , 1998 .

[75]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Keystroke Analysis of Learning and Transfer in Text Editing , 1987, SGCH.

[76]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  Research Report: The Role of Behavioral Modeling in Computer Skills Acquisition: Toward Refinement of the Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[77]  A. Dickinson.  Contemporary Animal Learning Theory , 1981 .

[78]  Jeng-Yi Tzeng,et al.  The impact of general and specific performance and self-efficacy on learning with computer-based concept mapping , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  H.-W. Chou,et al.  Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[80]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[81]  I. Mclaren,et al.  Learned Associability and Associative Change in Human Causal Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[82]  G. Davey,et al.  Animal Learning and Conditioning , 1981 .

[83]  I. Higginson,et al.  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs , 2011 .

[84]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Beginning SAP R/3 Implementation at Geneva Pharmaceuticals , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor model , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[86]  Timo Mäantylä,et al.  Optimizing Cue Effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600 Incidentally Learned Words , 1986 .

[87]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[88]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[89]  R. R. Miller,et al.  What's elementary about associative learning? , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[90]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Modern methods for business research , 1998 .

[91]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Training End Users: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Methods , 1993, MIS Q..

[92]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[93]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[94]  Maxwell K. Hsu,et al.  Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[95]  A. Bandura.  Reflections on self-efficacy , 1978 .

[96]  R. Kling,et al.  Book Review: Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices , 1991 .

[97]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[98]  Tom Beckers,et al.  Higher-Order Retrospective Revaluation in Human Causal Learning , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.