Antenatal care and caesarean sections: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982–2015

Abstract Background Antenatal care and correctly indicated caesarean section can positively impact on health outcomes of the mother and newborn. Our objective was to describe how coverage and inequalities for these interventions changed from 1982 to 2015 in Pelotas, Brazil. Methods Using perinatal data from the 1982, 1993, 2004 and 2015 Pelotas birth cohorts, we assessed antenatal care coverage and caesarean section rates over time. Antenatal care indicators included the median number of visits, the prevalence of mothers attending at least six visits and the proportion who started antenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy and attended at least six visits. We described these outcomes according to income quintiles and maternal skin colour, to identify inequalities. We described overall, private sector and public sector caesarean section rates. Differences in prevalence were tested using chi-square testing and median differences using Kruskal-Wallis testing. Results From 1982 to 2015, the median number of antenatal care visits and the prevalence of mothers attending at least six visits increased in all income quintiles and skin colour groups. Inequalities were reduced, but not eliminated. The overall proportion of caesarean births increased from 27.6% in 1982 to 65.1% in 2015, when 93.9% of the births in the private sector were by caesarean section. Absolute income-related inequalities in caesarean sections increased over time. Conclusions Special attention should be given to the antenatal care of poor and Black women in order to reduce inequalities. The explosive increase in caesarean sections requires radical changes in delivery care policies, in order to reverse the current trend.

[1]  D. Pearce,et al.  Ensure Healthy Lives and Promote Well-Being for All At All Ages , 2021, Geosciences and the Sustainable Development Goals.

[2]  B. Horta,et al.  Trends and inequalities in maternal and child health in a Brazilian city: methodology and sociodemographic description of four population-based birth cohort studies, 1982–2015 , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A. Raj,et al.  Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health , 2018, The Lancet.

[4]  J. Norman,et al.  Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[5]  F. Barros,et al.  Cohort Profile Cohort Profile : The 2015 Pelotas ( Brazil ) Birth Cohort Study , 2018 .

[6]  F. Magne,et al.  The Elevated Rate of Cesarean Section and Its Contribution to Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases in Latin America: The Growing Involvement of the Microbiota , 2017, Front. Pediatr..

[7]  D. Doku,et al.  Survival analysis of the association between antenatal care attendance and neonatal mortality in 57 low- and middle-income countries , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  J. P. Peña-Rosas,et al.  WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  D. Goodman,et al.  Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, BMJ Open.

[10]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016 .

[11]  Jun Zhang,et al.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014 , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[13]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[14]  A. Matijasevich,et al.  Cesarean sections in Brazil: will they ever stop increasing? , 2015, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[15]  Cesar G Victora,et al.  Cohort Profile Update: The 1982 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  April WHO Statement on caesarean section rates , 2015, Reproductive health matters.

[17]  E. d’Orsi,et al.  Process of decision-making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. , 2014, Cadernos de saude publica.

[18]  F. Barros,et al.  Cohort Profile Update: 2004 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. Body composition, mental health and genetic assessment at the 6 years follow-up , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  F. Barros,et al.  Cohort Profile update: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort follow-up visits in adolescence , 2014, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  R. Ye,et al.  Caesarean delivery, caesarean delivery on maternal request and childhood overweight: a Chinese birth cohort study of 181 380 children , 2014, Pediatric obesity.

[21]  Liang Wang,et al.  Cesarean section and the risk of overweight in grade 6 children , 2013, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[22]  A. Barros,et al.  Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Determining and Interpreting Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Interventions , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[23]  K. Noronha,et al.  Antenatal care use in Brazil and India: scale, outreach and socioeconomic inequality. , 2012, Health & place.

[24]  H. Abenhaim,et al.  Inadequate Prenatal Care Utilization and Risks of Infant Mortality and Poor Birth Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. Deliveries over 8 Years , 2012, American Journal of Perinatology.

[25]  M. Leal,et al.  [The decision of women for cesarean birth: a case study in two units of the supplementary health care system of the State of Rio de Janeiro]. , 2008, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[26]  J. Wohlfahrt,et al.  Caesarean delivery and risk of atopy and allergic disesase: meta‐analyses , 2008, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[27]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies , 2008, Diabetologia.

[28]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[29]  F. Barros,et al.  [The 2004 Pelotas birth cohort: methods and description]. , 2006, Revista de saude publica.

[30]  J. Singer,et al.  Infant death: an analysis by maternal risk and health care , 1973 .