Transfusion rate and prevalence of unexpected red blood cell alloantibodies in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease

Objective. To determine transfusion rates, risk factors for transfusion and the prevalence of unexpected red blood cell alloantibodies in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. In addition, we aimed to evaluate the necessity of the pretransfusion testing for red blood cell alloantibodies. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. The Danish Hysterectomy Database and a regional computerized blood bank register. Population. The 4 181 hysterectomies in 2004 reported to the Hysterectomy Database. The blood bank registers 2 603 hysterectomies performed between 1997 and 2005. Methods. From the hysterectomy database, information about indications for the hysterectomy, surgical procedures, re‐operations, number of blood transfusions, and demographic, descriptive and clinical characteristics were extracted. Urgency of the transfusion episodes was evaluated by a retrospective review of the patients’ medical records. From the regional blood bank register, results of the screening for red blood cell alloantibodies were extracted. Main Outcome Measures. Transfusion rates, prevalence of unexpected red blood cell alloantibodies. Results. In all, 242 women (5.8%) received blood transfusions, but only 32 of the 4 181 women (0.77%) were urgently transfused. Re‐operations were frequently associated with urgent blood transfusions. Nine of the 2 603 women from the regional register (0.35%) had newly detected, clinically significant red blood cell alloantibodies. Conclusions. The risk of a hemolytic transfusion reaction was estimated to be less than 1 in 17 000 hysterectomies (upper confidence limit) if the routine pretransfusion test were to be omitted. We suggest that reconsideration of the necessity for routine preoperative pretransfusion testing for women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease is indicated.

[1]  T. Scalea,et al.  Safety of uncrossmatched type-O red cells for resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  B. Ottesen,et al.  [The Danish Hysterectomy Database seen from a public health-economic perspective]. , 2005, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[3]  K. Titlestad,et al.  Cesarean section: Is pretransfusion testing for red cell alloantibodies necessary? , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  K. Titlestad,et al.  Monitoring transfusion practice – a computerized procedure , 2002, Transfusion medicine.

[5]  G. Otton,et al.  Transfusion rate associated with hysterectomy for benign disease , 2001, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[6]  C. Milkins,et al.  The computer crossmatch: a safe alternative to the serological crossmatch , 2000, Transfusion medicine.

[7]  Chow Ey,et al.  The impact of the type and screen test policy on hospital transfusion practice. , 1999 .

[8]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[9]  G. Ferzli,et al.  Cost effectiveness of routine type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  E. Y. Chow,et al.  The impact of the type and screen test policy on hospital transfusion practice. , 1999, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[11]  Pinkerton,et al.  Changes in red‐cell transfusion practice in a tertiary care hospital during the 1990s — a 7‐year study , 1998, Transfusion medicine.

[12]  S. P. ng Blood Transfusion Requirements for Abdominal Hysterectomy: 3‐year Experience in a District Hospital (1993–1995) , 1997, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[13]  J. Georgsen,et al.  [Transfusion service of the county of Funen. Organizational and economical aspects of restructuring]. , 1997, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[14]  G. Stirrat,et al.  Blood transfusion in obstetrics and gynaecology , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  S. Ransom,et al.  A cost-effectiveness evaluation of preoperative type-and-screen testing for vaginal hysterectomy. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  L. Cousins,et al.  Pre‐Cesarean Blood Bank Orders: A Safe and Less Expensive Approach , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M. Frazer,et al.  Hysterectomy Revisited , 1991, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[18]  B. McLellan,et al.  Seven years experience with group O unmatched packed red blood cells in a regional trauma unit. , 1987, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  Sullivan Mf,et al.  Preoperative crossmatch ordering and blood use in elective hysterectomy. , 1985 .

[20]  P. Mintz,et al.  Preoperative Crossmatch Ordering and Blood Use in Elective Hysterectomy , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.