Characterising the tumour morphological response to therapeutic intervention: an ex vivo model

SUMMARY In cancer, morphological assessment of histological tissue samples is a fundamental part of both diagnosis and prognosis. Image analysis offers opportunities to support that assessment through quantitative metrics of morphology. Generally, morphometric analysis is carried out on two-dimensional tissue section data and so only represents a small fraction of any tumour. We present a novel application of three-dimensional (3D) morphometrics for 3D imaging data obtained from tumours grown in a culture model. Minkowski functionals, a set of measures that characterise geometry and topology in n-dimensional space, are used to quantify tumour topology in the absence of and in response to therapeutic intervention. These measures are used to stratify the morphological response of tumours to therapeutic intervention. Breast tumours are characterised by estrogen receptor (ER) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2 status and tumour grade. Previously, we have shown that ER status is associated with tumour volume in response to tamoxifen treatment ex vivo. Here, HER2 status is found to predict the changes in morphology other than volume as a result of tamoxifen treatment ex vivo. Finally, we show the extent to which Minkowski functionals might be used to predict tumour grade. Minkowski functionals are generalisable to any 3D data set, including in vivo and cellular systems. This quantitative topological analysis can provide a valuable link among biomarkers, drug intervention and tumour morphology that is complementary to existing, non-morphological measures of tumour response to intervention and could ultimately inform patient treatment.

[1]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  Molecular Predictors of 3D Morphogenesis by Breast Cancer Cell Lines in 3D Culture , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science , 2002, Technometrics.

[3]  Tan Min Pau,et al.  Genetic structure of the snakehead murrel, Channa striata (channidae) based on the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene: Influence of historical and geomorphological factors , 2011, Genetics and molecular biology.

[4]  Jayanta Debnath,et al.  Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  M. Edward,et al.  Keratinocyte regulation of TGF‐β and connective tissue growth factor expression: A role in suppression of scar tissue formation , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[6]  COMPUTATION OF MINKOWSKI MEASURES ON 2 D AND 3 D BINARY IMAGES D , 2007 .

[7]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[8]  Wolfgang Moritz,et al.  Towards automated production and drug sensitivity testing using scaffold-free spherical tumor microtissues. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[9]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Tumor Metastasis: Molecular Insights and Evolving Paradigms , 2011, Cell.

[10]  T. Buchert,et al.  Beyond Genus Statistics: A Unifying Approach to the Morphology of Cosmic Structure , 1997, astro-ph/9702130.

[11]  D. Harrison,et al.  Determining tamoxifen sensitivity using primary breast cancer tissue in collagen-based three-dimensional culture. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[12]  J. Russo,et al.  MMTV Env encodes an ITAM responsible for transformation of mammary epithelial cells in three-dimensional culture , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[14]  Z. Werb,et al.  Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[15]  M. Yaffe Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  Efstathios Eleftheriadis,et al.  Vascular fractal dimension and total vascular area in the study of oral cancer , 2009, Head & neck.

[17]  Minkowski Functionals of SDSS Galaxies I : Analysis of Excursion Sets , 2003, astro-ph/0304455.

[18]  R. Millikan,et al.  Increased claudin‐4 expression is associated with poor prognosis and high tumour grade in breast cancer , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[19]  J. O’Sullivan,et al.  Tumor Budding is a Strong and Reproducible Prognostic Marker in T3N0 Colorectal Cancer , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  K. Mecke,et al.  3D structural analysis: sensitivity of Minkowski functionals , 2010, Journal of microscopy.

[21]  F. Prall,et al.  Aggressive colorectal carcinoma phenotypes of invasion can be assessed reproducibly and effectively predict poor survival: interobserver study and multivariate survival analysis of a prospectively collected series of 299 patients after potentially curative resections with long‐term follow‐up , 2011, Histopathology.

[22]  L. Bodin,et al.  Characterization of colon carcinoma growth pattern by computerized morphometry: definition of a complexity index. , 2008, International journal of molecular medicine.

[23]  A. Eynard,et al.  Assessment of colorectal cancer prognosis through nuclear morphometry. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  R. Meehan,et al.  Targeting of Rac GTPases blocks the spread of intact human breast cancer , 2012, Oncotarget.

[25]  D. Cameron,et al.  Sensitivity to pertuzumab (2C4) in ovarian cancer models: cross-talk with estrogen receptor signaling , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[26]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  Systematic Analysis of Breast Cancer Morphology Uncovers Stromal Features Associated with Survival , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[27]  Torsten Mattfeldt,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF MAMMARY GLAND TISSUE USING JOINT ESTIMATORS OF MINKOWSKI FUNCTIONALS , 2011 .

[28]  Luc Stoppini,et al.  OrganDots – an organotypic 3D tissue culture platform for drug development , 2012, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[29]  N. Bertos,et al.  Breast cancer - one term, many entities? , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  M. Edward,et al.  A gene on the HER2 amplicon, C35, is an oncogene in breast cancer whose actions are prevented by inhibition of Syk , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  Marie-Françoise Devaux,et al.  COMPUTATION OF MINKOWSKI MEASURES ON 2D AND 3D BINARY IMAGES , 2011 .

[32]  Tetyana Sych,et al.  3D IMAGE ANALYSIS OF OPEN FOAMS USING RANDOM TESSELLATIONS , 2011 .

[33]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  Molecular Predictors of 3 D Morphogenesis by Breast Cancer Cell Lines in 3 D Culture , 2010 .

[34]  V. Smith,et al.  An Analytical Approach Differentiates Between Individual and Collective Cancer Invasion , 2011, Analytical cellular pathology.

[35]  Rudolf Hanka,et al.  Assessing Agreement between Multiple Raters with Missing Rating Information, Applied to Breast Cancer Tumour Grading , 2008, PloS one.

[36]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[37]  D. Harrison,et al.  Long-term Culture of Human Breast Cancer Specimens and Their Analysis Using Optical Projection Tomography , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[38]  Konradin Metze,et al.  Fractal dimension of chromatin is an independent prognostic factor for survival in melanoma , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[39]  Gordon B Mills,et al.  Inhibition of PI3K/mTOR leads to adaptive resistance in matrix-attached cancer cells. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[40]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Automated classification of breast parenchymal density: topologic analysis of x-ray attenuation patterns depicted with digital mammography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  Alasdair N. Houston,et al.  Emergent Behavior of Soil Fungal Dynamics: Influence of Soil Architecture and Water Distribution , 2012 .

[42]  Genee Y. Lee,et al.  The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three‐dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expression , 2007, Molecular oncology.