A Note about the Effect of Auditor Cognitive Style on Task Performance

Previous research documents variation among auditors in terms of their cognitive style. Auditors have been classified as possessing an intuitive, analytic, or hybrid cognitive style. However, the potential implications of cognitive style upon auditor task performance have received little attention. Building upon the work of Chan (1996), this paper examines the role of “cognitive misfit” on auditor task performance. Cognitive misfit is a lack of fit between a person's cognitive style and task characteristics. Participating auditors were required to perform two judgment tasks and complete a cognitive style questionnaire. Tests for an interactive task performance effect between task type and auditor cognitive characteristics were performed. As expected, auditor cognitive style significantly interacts with the task type. Analytic auditors performed better on the analytic task than the intuitive task. Likewise, intuitive auditors performed better on the intuitive task than on the analytic task. Limitations and...

[1]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[2]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Cognitive Style Research: A Perspective for Integration , 2015, ICIS.

[3]  Paul G. Schloemer,et al.  The Personality Types and Preferences of CPA Firm Professionals: An Analysis of Changes in the Profession , 1997 .

[4]  M. Carlyn,et al.  An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. , 1977, Journal of personality assessment.

[5]  Robert Libby,et al.  Availability And The Generation Of Hypotheses In Analytical Review , 1985 .

[6]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[7]  Richard A. Cosier,et al.  Effects of cognitive styles and decision setting on performance , 1990 .

[8]  P. Otte.  Psychological typology of the local firm certified public accountant , 1983 .

[9]  Cornelius J. Casey.  The Usefulness Of Accounting Ratios For Subjects Predictions Of Corporate Failure - Replication And Extensions , 1980 .

[10]  T. Pearson,et al.  Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  Correlations among the Group Embedded Figures Test, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Demographic Characteristics: A Business School Study , 1988 .

[12]  Sarah E. Bonner.  A model of the effects of audit task complexity , 1994 .

[13]  Cindy Moeckel,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EXPERIENCE ON AUDITORS MEMORY ERRORS , 1990 .

[14]  David Chan,et al.  Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit , 1996 .

[15]  J. C. Henderson,et al.  The Influence of Decision Style on Decision Making Behavior , 1980 .

[16]  R. Zmud.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[17]  Donald L. Davis,et al.  Are some cognitive types better decision makers than others? An empirical investigation , 1982 .

[18]  Thomas J. Housel,et al.  The Effects of Information and Cognitive Processes on Decision Making , 1987 .

[19]  Richard L. Ott,et al.  An empirical investigation into the interactive effects of student personality traits and method of instruction (lecture or CAI) on student performance in elementary accounting , 1990 .

[20]  R. G. Hunt,et al.  Cognitive style and decision making , 1989 .