Assessment of breast density: reader performance using synthetic mammographic images

The quantity and appearance of dense breast tissue in mammograms is related to the risk of developing breast cancer, the sensitivity of mammographic interpretation, and the likelihood of local recurrence of cancer following surgery. Visual assessment of breast density is widely used, often with readers indicating the percentage of dense tissue in a mammogram. Although real mammograms can be used to investigate intra- and inter-observer variability, ground truth is difficult to ascertain, so to investigate reader accuracy, we created 60 synthetic, mammogram-like images with densities comparable in area to those found in screening. The images contained either a single dense area, multiple or linear densities, or a variable breast size with a single density. The images were randomized and assessed by 9 expert and 6 non-expert readers who marked percentage area of density on a visual analogue scale. Non-expert readers' estimates of percentage area of density were closer to the truth (6-11% mean absolute difference) than the experts' estimates (10- 19%). The readers were most accurate when the density formed a single area in the image, and least accurate when the dense area was composed of linear structures. In almost every case, the dense area was overestimated by the expert readers. When experts were ranked according to the degree of overestimation, this broadly reflected their relative performance on real mammograms.

[1]  Gary J. Whitman,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery , 2010 .

[2]  Mary Wilson,et al.  Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Synthesising Malignant Breast Masses in Normal Mammograms , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  A comparative study of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging: results from a high-risk population , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Carola Werner,et al.  Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[10]  N F Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk , 1997, Cancer.

[11]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[12]  N F Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Breast disease.

[13]  J. Kaufhold,et al.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[14]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[17]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Effect of Breast Density on Computer Aided Detection , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[20]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  A New Step-Wedge for the Volumetric Measurement of Mammographic Density , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[21]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Visual Assessment of Density in Digital Mammograms , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[22]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  Gina R Petroni,et al.  Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[25]  Anthony Maxwell,et al.  Volumetric Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in a Screening Population , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[26]  Jeff Wang,et al.  Improvements to Single Energy Absorptiometry Method for Digital Mammography to Quantify Breast Tissue Density , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[27]  Tulin Cil,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast‐conserving surgery , 2009, Cancer.