Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Current Understanding and Future Directions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Vincent-Salomon,et al. TROP2, androgen receptor, and PD‐L1 status in histological subtypes of high‐grade metaplastic breast carcinomas , 2022, Histopathology.
[2] K. Kalinsky,et al. Trop-2 as a Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer , 2022, Cancers.
[3] Yuan Guo,et al. Nomogram for the prediction of triple-negative breast cancer histological heterogeneity based on multiparameter MRI features: A preliminary study including metaplastic carcinoma and non- metaplastic carcinoma , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.
[4] Yanni Jiang,et al. Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast: MRI Features with Clinical and Histopathologic Correlation. , 2022, Academic radiology.
[5] R. Verma,et al. Clinicopathologic Features of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience From a Tertiary Cancer Center of North India , 2022, Cureus.
[6] S. Bandyopadhyay,et al. Estrogen receptor status has no prognostic relevance in metaplastic breast carcinoma , 2022, Cancer treatment and research communications.
[7] L. Testa,et al. Disease Behavior and Treatment Response of Special Histological Types of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2022, Clinical breast cancer.
[8] Sung-Bae Kim,et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer , 2022, New England Journal of Medicine.
[9] Jeffrey T. Chang,et al. Molecular characterization and prospective evaluation of pathological response and outcomes with neoadjuvant therapy in metaplastic triple-negative breast cancer. , 2022, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[10] M. Dooms,et al. Characteristics of Early Phase Clinical Trials for Rare Cancers: Insights From Interviews With Stakeholders , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.
[11] G. Wang,et al. Histological subtype is associated with PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in triple-negative breast carcinoma. , 2022, Annals of diagnostic pathology.
[12] E. B. Butler,et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Response Rates, Management, and Outcomes. , 2022, Clinical breast cancer.
[13] C. Perou,et al. Molecular analysis of TCGA breast cancer histologic types , 2021, Cell genomics.
[14] R. Gray,et al. A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Cohort 36 of Dual Anti–CTLA-4 and Anti–PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART, SWOG S1609) , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.
[15] G. Plitas,et al. Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma , 2021, NPJ breast cancer.
[16] S. Ganesan,et al. Durable Response to PD1 Inhibitor Pembrolizumab in a Metastatic, Metaplastic Breast Cancer , 2021, Case Reports in Oncology.
[17] J. Reis-Filho,et al. PD-L1 Expression in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Using the PD-L1 SP142 Assay and Concordance Among PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Assays , 2021, The American journal of surgical pathology.
[18] C. Criscitiello,et al. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with special histology subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review , 2021, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[19] M. Piccart,et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.
[20] Z. Nahleh,et al. Clinical and Demographic Factors, Treatment Patterns, and Overall Survival Associated With Rare Triple-Negative Breast Carcinomas in the US , 2021, JAMA network open.
[21] G. Plitas,et al. Survival Outcomes for Metaplastic Breast Cancer Differ by Histologic Subtype , 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[22] N. Meropol,et al. Bridging the divide between clinical research and clinical care in oncology: An integrated real-world evidence generation platform , 2021, Digital health.
[23] H. Abdel-Razeq,et al. Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in the Middle East , 2021, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.
[24] J. Cameselle-Teijeiro,et al. New criteria to select patients with breast cancer to perform germline BRCA1/2 testing , 2021, Clinical Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine.
[25] I. Chen,et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte abundance and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in metaplastic breast carcinoma: implications for distinct immune microenvironments in different metaplastic components , 2020, Virchows Archiv.
[26] J. Reis-Filho,et al. The genetic landscape of metaplastic breast cancers and uterine carcinosarcomas , 2020, Molecular oncology.
[27] P. Kuo,et al. Big Data Solutions for Controversies in Breast Cancer Treatment. , 2020, Clinical breast cancer.
[28] J. Pérez-García,et al. Molecular Features of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: An Infrequent Subtype of Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma , 2020, Cancers.
[29] S. Gallus,et al. Histologic subtyping affecting outcome of triple negative breast cancer: a large Sardinian population-based analysis , 2020, BMC Cancer.
[30] Masayuki Yoshida,et al. Response to Dabrafenib and Trametinib of a Patient with Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Harboring a BRAF V600E Mutation , 2020, Case reports in oncological medicine.
[31] G. Babiera,et al. Outcomes after Treatment of Metaplastic Versus Other Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2020, Journal of Cancer.
[32] K. Hess,et al. Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[33] T. Al-Tweigeri,et al. Complete Response of Chemo-Refractory Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer to Paclitaxel-Immunotherapy Combination , 2019, The American journal of case reports.
[34] G. Calin,et al. The role of radiotherapy in metaplastic breast cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of the SEER database , 2019, Journal of Translational Medicine.
[35] Yukako Yagi,et al. Implementation of Digital Pathology Offers Clinical and Operational Increase in Efficiency and Cost Savings. , 2019, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[36] E. Romond,et al. Adjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative Metaplastic Breast Cancer With Weekly Paclitaxel and Platinum Chemotherapy: Retrospective Case Review From a Single Institution. , 2019, Clinical breast cancer.
[37] D. Visscher,et al. Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy , 2019, Breast cancer research and treatment.
[38] M. Gurcan,et al. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.
[39] E. Lee,et al. Different Patterns of Conditional Survival of Breast Cancer Patients by Age and Histologic Types: Evidence from the Korean Nationwide Registry , 2019, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
[40] M. Beg,et al. Survival and treatment outcomes of metaplastic breast carcinoma: Single tertiary care center experience in Pakistan. , 2019, Indian journal of cancer.
[41] P. Arasteh,et al. Does metaplastic breast carcinoma demonstrate a different clinicopathological behavior in our region: The Shiraz Breast Cancer Registry , 2019, The breast journal.
[42] I. Chen,et al. PI3K inhibitor provides durable response in metastatic metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: A hidden gem in the BELLE-4 study. , 2019, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.
[43] M. Gurcan,et al. Relationship between the Ki67 index and its area based approximation in breast cancer , 2018, BMC Cancer.
[44] S. Hoover,et al. Histologic heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer: A National Cancer Centre Database analysis. , 2018, European journal of cancer.
[45] Jubilee Brown,et al. Clinical trial methodology in rare gynecologic tumor research: Strategies for success. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.
[46] T. Hyslop,et al. Metaplastic Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in 2500 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Oncology Database , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[47] Berkman Sahiner,et al. Optimized generation of high-resolution phantom images using cGAN: Application to quantification of Ki67 breast cancer images , 2018, PloS one.
[48] L. Miller,et al. Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014. , 2018, The oncologist.
[49] C. Maher,et al. Genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in metaplastic carcinomas of the breast , 2017, npj Breast Cancer.
[50] A. Jemal,et al. The burden of rare cancers in the United States , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[51] K. Hess,et al. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway for the Treatment of Mesenchymal Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Phase 1 Trial of mTOR Inhibition in Combination With Liposomal Doxorubicin and Bevacizumab , 2017, JAMA oncology.
[52] O. Mariani,et al. The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Metaplastic Breast Carcinomas , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.
[53] O. Elemento,et al. Role of RPL39 in Metaplastic Breast Cancer , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[54] Congmin Liu,et al. Response to apatinib in chemotherapy-failed advanced spindle cell breast carcinoma , 2016, Oncotarget.
[55] J. Palazzo,et al. Comprehensive profiling of metaplastic breast carcinomas reveals frequent overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1 , 2016, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[56] E. Rakha,et al. Imaging overview of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: a large study of 71 cases. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.
[57] P. Argani,et al. A Clinicopathologic Analysis of 45 Patients With Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma. , 2016, American journal of clinical pathology.
[58] Guangliang Yin,et al. Whole exome sequencing of rare aggressive breast cancer histologies , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[59] J. Blay,et al. The value of research collaborations and consortia in rare cancers. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.
[60] O. Mariani,et al. Metastatic breast carcinomas display genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity , 2015, Modern Pathology.
[61] F. Climent,et al. Prognostic factors in metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: a multi-institutional study , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.
[62] M. Coleman,et al. Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[63] T. Koehler,et al. Hormone Receptor Status Does Not Affect Prognosis in Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis with Comparison to Infiltrating Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[64] R. Nelson,et al. Survival Outcomes of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Patients: Results from a US Population-based Analysis , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[65] Steven J. M. Jones,et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.
[66] Chiun-Sheng Huang,et al. Lack of efficacy to systemic chemotherapy for treatment of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast in the modern era , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[67] Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al. Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[68] A. Luini,et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, an unusual disease with worse prognosis: the experience of the European Institute of Oncology and review of the literature , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[69] K. Bland,et al. Characteristics and Treatment of Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Analysis of 892 Cases from the National Cancer Data Base , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[70] S. Lakhani,et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas are basal‐like tumours , 2006, Histopathology.
[71] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Biphasic metaplastic sarcomatoid carcinoma of the breast. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[72] Berkman Sahiner,et al. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications. , 2002, Academic radiology.
[73] Berkman Sahiner,et al. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.