Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP 3 ) Framework: Presenting a Generalized Product Family Model

Development of a family of products that satisfies different sectors of the market introduces significant challenges to today’s manufacturing industries – from development time to aftermarket services. A product family with a common platform paradigm offers a powerful solution to these daunting challenges. The Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP 3 ) framework formulates a flexible product family model that (i) seeks to eliminate traditional boundaries between modular and scalable families, (ii) allows the formation of sub-families of products, and (iii) yield the optimal depth and number of platforms. In this paper, the CP 3 framework introduces a solution strategy that obviates common assumptions; namely (i) the identification of platform/non-platform design variables and the determination of variable values are separate processes, and (ii) the cost reduction of creating product platforms is independent of the total number of each product manufactured. A new Cost Decay Function (CDF) is developed to approximate the reduction in cost with increasing commonalities among products, for a specified capacity of production. The Mixed Integer Non-Liner Programming (MINLP) problem, presented by the CP 3 model, is solved using a novel Platform Segregating Mapping Function (PSMF). The proposed CP 3 framework is implemented on a family of universal electric motors.

[1]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[2]  T. Simpson Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families , 2006 .

[3]  Stephen J. Chapman,et al.  Electric Machinery and Power System Fundamentals , 2001 .

[4]  Li-ya Wang,et al.  A modified genetic algorithm for product family optimization with platform specified by information theoretical approach , 2008 .

[5]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[6]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  An efficient decomposed multiobjective genetic algorithm for solving the joint product platform selection and product family design problem with generalized commonality , 2009 .

[7]  Michael J. Scott,et al.  Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation , 2006 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  PRODUCT FAMILY AND PLATFORM PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[10]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Optimal Design of Product Families Using Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) Methodology , 2006 .

[11]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[12]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[13]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[14]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[15]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm , 2004, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[16]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Modular product family design: Agent-based Pareto-optimization and quality loss function-based post-optimal analysis , 2003 .

[17]  Kunihiko Fujita,et al.  Product Variety Optimiza-tion: Simultaneous Optimization of Module Combination and Module Attributes , 2001 .

[18]  Carlos M. Fonseca,et al.  Multiobjective genetic algorithms , 1993 .

[19]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[20]  T. Simpson,et al.  Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method , 1996 .

[21]  Karl Sabbagh,et al.  21st century jet : the making and marketing of the Boeing 777 , 1996 .

[22]  Souma Chowdhury,et al.  Improvements to single-objective constrained predator–prey evolutionary optimization algorithm , 2010 .

[23]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Comparison of Modular Measurement Methods Based on Consistency Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis , 2003 .

[24]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Product platform and product family design : methods and applications , 2010 .

[25]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[26]  Helcio R. B. Orlande,et al.  Inverse and Optimization Problems in Heat Transfer , 2006 .