Use of a Disulfide Cross-linking Strategy to Study Muscarinic Receptor Structure and Mechanisms of Activation*

To gain insight into the molecular architecture of the cytoplasmic surface of G protein-coupled receptors, we have developed a disulfide cross-linking strategy using the m3 muscarinic receptor as a model system. To facilitate the interpretation of disulfide cross-linking data, we initially generated a mutant m3 muscarinic receptor (referred to as m3′(3C)-Xa) in which most native Cys residues had been deleted or substituted with Ala or Ser (remaining Cys residues Cys-140, Cys-220, and Cys-532) and in which the central portion of the third intracellular loop had been replaced with a factor Xa cleavage site. Radioligand binding and second messenger assays showed that the m3′(3C)-Xa mutant receptor was fully functional. In the next step, pairs of Cys residues were reintroduced into the m3′(3C)-Xa construct, thus generating 10 double Cys mutant receptors. All 10 mutant receptors contained a Cys residue at position 169 at the beginning of the second intracellular loop and a second Cys within the C-terminal portion of the third intracellular loop, at positions 484–493. Radioligand binding studies and phosphatidylinositol assays indicated that all double Cys mutant receptors were properly folded. Membrane lysates prepared from COS-7 cells transfected with the different mutant receptor constructs were incubated with factor Xa protease and the oxidizing agent Cu(II)-(1,10-phenanthroline)3, and the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds between juxtaposed Cys residues was monitored by using a combined immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting strategy. To our surprise, efficient disulfide cross-linking was observed with 8 of the 10 double Cys mutant receptors studied (Cys-169/Cys-484 to Cys-491), suggesting that the intracellular m3 receptor surface is characterized by pronounced backbone fluctuations. Moreover, [35S]guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assays indicated that the formation of intramolecular disulfide cross-links prevented or strongly inhibited receptor-mediated G protein activation, suggesting that the highly dynamic character of the cytoplasmic receptor surface is a prerequisite for efficient receptor-G protein interactions. This is the first study using a disulfide mapping strategy to examine the three-dimensional structure of a hormone-activated G protein-coupled receptor.

[1]  W. N. Burnette,et al.  "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. , 1981, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  H. Khorana,et al.  Cysteine residues 110 and 187 are essential for the formation of correct structure in bovine rhodopsin. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  T. Schwartz,et al.  Split-receptors in the tachykinin neurokinin-1 system--mutational analysis of intracellular loop 3. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.

[4]  T. Bonner,et al.  Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. , 1987, Science.

[5]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[6]  J. Falke,et al.  Thermal motions of surface alpha-helices in the D-galactose chemosensory receptor. Detection by disulfide trapping. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  G. Corsini,et al.  Functional Role of the Third Cytoplasmic Loop in Muscarinic Receptor Dimerization* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  H. W. Harris,et al.  Disulfide Bonds in the Extracellular Calcium-Polyvalent Cation-sensing Receptor Correlate with Dimer Formation and Its Response to Divalent Cations in Vitro * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  W. Sadee,et al.  Internalization of the Hm1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor involves the third cytoplasmic loop , 1990, FEBS letters.

[11]  J. Baldwin,et al.  An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  W. Wang,et al.  A Disulfide Bond between Conserved Extracellular Cysteines in the Thyrotropin-releasing Hormone Receptor Is Critical for Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[14]  D. Oprian,et al.  A general method for mapping tertiary contacts between amino acid residues in membrane-embedded proteins. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[15]  M. Caron,et al.  Role of extracellular disulfide-bonded cysteines in the ligand binding function of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[16]  R. Higuchi Using PCR to Engineer DNA , 1989 .

[17]  J. Wess,et al.  Molecular basis of receptor/G-protein-coupling selectivity. , 1998, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  J. Thorner,et al.  Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. , 1991, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  K. Hideg,et al.  Photoactivated conformational changes in rhodopsin: a time-resolved spin label study. , 1993, Science.

[20]  J. Falke,et al.  Cysteine and Disulfide Scanning Reveals a Regulatory α-Helix in the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Aspartate Receptor* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  E. Brown,et al.  Dimerization of the Extracellular Calcium-sensing Receptor (CaR) on the Cell Surface of CaR-transfected HEK293 Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Palm,et al.  Conformation of a beta-adrenoceptor-derived signal transducing peptide as inferred by circular dichroism and 1H NMR spectroscopy. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[23]  H Weinstein,et al.  Agonists induce conformational changes in transmembrane domains III and VI of the β2 adrenoceptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[24]  J. Wess,et al.  Functional rescue of mutant V2 vasopressin receptors causing nephrogenic diabetes insipidus by a co‐expressed receptor polypeptide. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[25]  S. S. Lee,et al.  In vivo assembly of rhodopsin from expressed polypeptide fragments. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  H. Bourne,et al.  How receptors talk to trimeric G proteins. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  J. Alderfer,et al.  Structure of the carboxy-terminal domain of bovine rhodopsin , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  J. Wess,et al.  Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes. , 1991, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[29]  S. Watson,et al.  The G-Protein Linked Receptor Facts Book , 1994 .

[30]  E. Hulme,et al.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Peptide sequencing identifies residues involved in antagonist binding and disulfide bond formation. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  C. Strader,et al.  Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Annual review of biochemistry.

[32]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structure and function in rhodopsin: topology of the C-terminal polypeptide chain in relation to the cytoplasmic loops. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Pakula,et al.  Determination of transmembrane protein structure by disulfide cross-linking: the Escherichia coli Tar receptor. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  G. Liapakis,et al.  Constitutive Activation of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor Alters the Orientation of Its Sixth Membrane-spanning Segment* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  M. Caron,et al.  Chimeric alpha 2-,beta 2-adrenergic receptors: delineation of domains involved in effector coupling and ligand binding specificity. , 1988, Science.

[36]  J. Wess G‐protein‐coupled receptors: molecular mechanisms involved in receptor activation and selectivity of G‐protein recognition , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[37]  Jie Liu,et al.  Plasma Membrane Localization and Functional Rescue of Truncated Forms of a G Protein-coupled Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Projection structure of rhodopsin , 1993, Nature.

[39]  C. Romano,et al.  Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Is a Disulfide-linked Dimer* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Rhodopsin activation blocked by metal-ion-binding sites linking transmembrane helices C and F , 1996, Nature.

[41]  J. Alderfer,et al.  The first and second cytoplasmic loops of the G-protein receptor, rhodopsin, independently form beta-turns. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[42]  C. Strader,et al.  Structural features required for ligand binding to the beta‐adrenergic receptor. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[43]  S. Lazareno,et al.  Pharmacological characterization of guanine nucleotide exchange reactions in membranes from CHO cells stably transfected with human muscarinic receptors m1-m4. , 1993, Life sciences.

[44]  C. Fraser,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the rat m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Role of conserved cysteines in receptor function. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  J. Wess,et al.  Reconstitution of functional muscarinic receptors by co‐expression of amino‐ and carboxyl‐terminal receptor fragments , 1993, FEBS letters.

[46]  N. Nathanson,et al.  Deletion analysis of the mouse m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: effects on phosphoinositide metabolism and down-regulation. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[47]  N. Nathanson,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Analysis of the role of N-glycosylation in receptor expression and function. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[48]  M. Berridge,et al.  Changes in the levels of inositol phosphates after agonist-dependent hydrolysis of membrane phosphoinositides. , 1983, The Biochemical journal.

[49]  D. Koshland,et al.  Disulfide cross-linking studies of the transmembrane regions of the aspartate sensory receptor of Escherichia coli. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  W. Sadee,et al.  Hm1 muscarinic cholinergic receptor internalization requires a domain in the third cytoplasmic loop. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[51]  H G Khorana,et al.  Structure and function in rhodopsin. Single cysteine substitution mutants in the cytoplasmic interhelical E-F loop region show position-specific effects in transducin activation. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[52]  N. Birdsall,et al.  Propylbenzilylcholine mustard labels an acidic residue in transmembrane helix 3 of the muscarinic receptor. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[53]  J. Baldwin The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein‐coupled receptors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[54]  H. Khorana,et al.  Mapping light-dependent structural changes in the cytoplasmic loop connecting helices C and D in rhodopsin: a site-directed spin labeling study. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[55]  R. Sowdhamini,et al.  Conformations of disulfide bridges in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[56]  D. Koshland,et al.  Global flexibility in a sensory receptor: a site-directed cross-linking approach. , 1987, Science.

[57]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[58]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Deducing the organization of a transmembrane domain by disulfide cross-linking. The bacterial chemoreceptor Trg. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[59]  D. Oprian,et al.  Disulfide bond exchange in rhodopsin. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[60]  D. Palm,et al.  NMR and circular dichroism studies of synthetic peptides derived from the third intracellular loop of the β‐adrenoceptor , 1995, FEBS letters.

[61]  C. Fraser,et al.  In vitro mutagenesis and the search for structure-function relationships among G protein-coupled receptors. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[62]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structural features and light-dependent changes in the cytoplasmic interhelical E-F loop region of rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[63]  H. Khorana,et al.  Structure and function in rhodopsin. Cysteines 65 and 316 are in proximity in a rhodopsin mutant as indicated by disulfide formation and interactions between attached spin labels. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[64]  J. Alderfer,et al.  Structure of the third cytoplasmic loop of bovine rhodopsin. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[65]  E. Peralta,et al.  Charged amino acids required for signal transduction by the m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[66]  B. Kobilka,et al.  Adrenergic receptors as models for G protein-coupled receptors. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[67]  J. Wess Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1996, Critical reviews in neurobiology.