The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.

When a warning signal (WS) precedes an imperative signal (IS) by a certain amount of time (the foreperiod, FP), responses are speeded. Moreover, this effect is modulated by the FP length in the previous trial. This sequential FP effect has lately been attributed to a trace-conditioning mechanism according to which individuals learn (and re-learn) temporal relationships between the WS and the IS. Recent evidence suggests that sensory WS attributes are critical to trigger time-related response activation. Specifically, when WS modality is shifted in subsequent trials (e.g., from auditory to visual modality), the sequential FP effect becomes attenuated. This study examined whether the sequential FP effect is reduced only by between-modality shifts or whether this attenuation generalizes to cross-trial shifts of WS attributes within modalities. We compared dimensional (low vs. high tone frequency) and qualitative shifts (pure tone vs. noise) of equal-intense auditory WS events. The results of four experiments revealed that shifts of tone frequency did not, whereas shifts of qualitative tone characteristics did attenuate the sequential FP effect. These results support the view that the WS acts as a trigger cue that unintentionally activates responses at previously reinforced critical moments.

[1]  T. Shallice,et al.  Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: a case for animal–human translational models , 2009, Psychological research.

[4]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Reaction time indices of attention deficits in boys with disruptive behavior disorders , 1991, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[5]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Temporal preparation in aging: A functional MRI study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Being prepared on time: on the importance of the previous foreperiod to current preparation, as reflected in speed, force and preparation-related brain potentials. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Frank Agter,et al.  Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: an event-related potential study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[12]  C. Spence,et al.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Bargh,et al.  Environmental control of goal-directed action: automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior. , 1994, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[14]  G. Logan.  Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  R Gottsdanker,et al.  Aging and the maintaining of preparation. , 1980, Experimental aging research.

[18]  H L Roediger,et al.  Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[20]  Sander A. Los,et al.  The effective time course of preparation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  A. Machado.  Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. , 1997, Psychological review.

[22]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  When Time Shapes Behavior: fMRI Evidence of Brain Correlates of Temporal Monitoring , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Hebb.  Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[24]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Human conceptual behavior , 1966 .

[25]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[26]  G. Logan,et al.  Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  A. R. Wagner.  Evolution of an elemental theory of Pavlovian conditioning , 2008, Learning & behavior.

[28]  S. Hackley.  The speeding of voluntary reaction by a warning signal. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[29]  R. Rescorla.  A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[30]  E. Martin,et al.  Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: an encoding variability hypothesis. , 1968, Psychological review.

[31]  T. Shallice,et al.  Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  The Anterior N1 Component as an Index of Modality Shifting , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Elemental Representations of Stimuli in Associative Learning , 2022 .

[34]  R. Elliott.  Simple reaction time: effects associated with age, preparatory interval, incentive-shift, and mode of presentation. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[35]  Erik W. Moody,et al.  Memory processes in classical conditioning , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time , 1971 .

[38]  J. Requin,et al.  The effect of conditional probability of the response signal on the simple reaction time. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[39]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Michael Erb,et al.  Separation of phasic arousal and expectancy effects in a speeded reaction time task via fMRI. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[41]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Actively Controlling Anticipation of Irregular Events , 1980 .

[42]  D. Heslenfeld,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: electrophysiological evidence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency , 1969 .

[44]  W. Notebaert,et al.  Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. , 2008, Psychological review.

[45]  E. T. Klemmer.  Simple reaction time as a function of time uncertainty. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  B. Hommel.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[48]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[49]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[50]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[51]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  P. Quinlan,et al.  Sequential effects in rudimentary auditory and visual tasks , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  D. Knol,et al.  The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[54]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  The auditory redundant signals effect: An influence of number of stimuli or number of percepts? , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[56]  S. Los,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  L. Karlin.  Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  T. Zahn,et al.  Simple reaction time as a function of the relative frequency of the preparatory interval. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  B. Milliken,et al.  Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.