THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE

[1]  A. Nederhof.  Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity. , 1989 .

[2]  Lowell L. Hargens.  Further Evidence on Field Differences in Consensus from the NSF Peer Review Studies. , 1988 .

[3]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates. , 1988 .

[4]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus , 1988 .

[5]  Clark McPhail,et al.  The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process , 1987 .

[6]  J. King.  A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation , 1987, J. Inf. Sci..

[7]  S. Wyatt,et al.  National performance in basic research , 1986, Nature.

[8]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Is Britain spending enough on science? , 1986, Nature.

[9]  Arie Rip,et al.  Between dirigism and laissez-faire: Effects of implementing the science policy priority for biotechnology in the Netherlands , 1986 .

[10]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal Level , 1986 .

[11]  T. Brooks.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  H. Moed,et al.  The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance , 1985 .

[13]  D. Cicchetti.  A critique of Whitehurst's "Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews": De omnibus, disputandem est. , 1985 .

[14]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  CERN: Past Performance and Future Prospects - I - CERN's Position in World High-Energy Physics , 1984 .

[15]  John Michael Ziman,et al.  The Bernal Lecture, 1983 - The collectivization of science , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  Stephen Cole,et al.  The Hierarchy of the Sciences? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Chandra G. Prabha,et al.  Some aspects of citation behavior: A pilot study in business administration , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton Telescope , 1983 .

[19]  S. Hayes.  When more is less: Quantity versus quality of publications in the evaluation of academic vitae. , 1983 .

[20]  Philip Howard Gray.  Using science citation analysis to evaluate administrative accountability for salary variance. , 1983 .

[21]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  M. Boor,et al.  The citation impact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality. , 1982 .

[23]  J. R. Cole,et al.  Chance and consensus in peer review. , 1981, Science.

[24]  Francis Narin,et al.  The adequacy of the science citation index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity , 1981, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Blaise Cronin.  Agreement and divergence on referencing practice , 1981 .

[26]  Richard Heinzkill,et al.  Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[27]  E. Garfield.  Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from That in Science? The Effect That ISI®'S Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities Is Expected to Have on Future Scholarship , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[28]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[29]  Stephen D. Gottfredson,et al.  Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. , 1978 .

[30]  F. C. Thorne.  The citation index: Another case of spurious validity , 1977 .

[31]  A. Porter.  Citation Analysis: Queries and Caveats , 1977 .

[32]  G. Gilbert.  Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[33]  D. Dieks,et al.  Differences in Impact of Scientific Publications: Some Indices Derived from a Citation Analysis , 1976 .

[34]  N Wade,et al.  Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators. , 1975, Science.

[35]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[36]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. , 1974 .

[37]  Robert Perloff,et al.  IMPROVING MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION PROCEDURES , 1972 .

[38]  Paul McReynolds,et al.  Reliability of ratings of research papers. , 1971 .

[39]  C. Myers.  Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology. , 1970 .

[40]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[41]  K. May.  Abuses of citation indexing. , 1967, Science.

[42]  J. Margolis,et al.  Citation Indexing and Evaluation of Scientific Papers , 1967, Science.

[43]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of science , 1962 .

[44]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory , 1962 .