Integrating Decision Support Models with Market and Non-Market Value Attributes for Platform Decommissioning: An Effective Approach for Resolving the Challenges Inherent at the Nexus of Science and Policy

[1]  Brock Bernstein,et al.  A multi‐attribute decision analysis for decommissioning offshore oil and gas platforms , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[2]  A. Power,et al.  Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world , 2005 .

[3]  Brock B Bernstein,et al.  Decision framework for platform decommissioning in California , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[4]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[6]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[7]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Quasi-separable utility functions† , 1968 .

[8]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Daniel O.B. Jones,et al.  A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure , 2014 .

[10]  Brock B Bernstein,et al.  Modeling fish production for southern California's petroleum platforms , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[11]  Erika J. Techera,et al.  Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment? , 2015 .

[12]  Katherine A Dafforn,et al.  Application of management tools to integrate ecological principles with the design of marine infrastructure. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Brock Bernstein,et al.  Considerations in evaluating potential socioeconomic impacts of offshore platform decommissioning in California , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[14]  Petter Osmundsen,et al.  Decommissioning of petroleum installations--major policy issues , 2003 .

[15]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management , 2001 .

[16]  Andrew Bressler,et al.  A costing model for offshore decommissioning in California , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[17]  Ashley M. Fowler,et al.  Rigs‐to‐reefs: will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat? , 2011 .

[18]  J. Kanmkamnerd,et al.  NEBA Application for Jacket Decommissioning Techniques , 2016 .

[19]  Max Henrion,et al.  A Decision Support Model for Platform Decommissioning: Successful Applications in California and Implications for Worldwide Use , 2016 .

[20]  Dolly Jørgensen.  OSPAR's exclusion of rigs-to-reefs in the North Sea , 2012 .

[21]  E. Chornesky,et al.  Using Science to Inform Controversial Issues: A Case Study from the California Ocean Science Trust , 2011 .

[22]  I. Boyd,et al.  The identification of priority policy options for UK nature conservation , 2010 .

[23]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[24]  Brock Bernstein,et al.  Air emissions associated with decommissioning California's offshore oil and gas platforms , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[25]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.