Barley adaptation and improvement in the Mediterranean basin

To study barley adaptation and improvement in the Mediterranean basin, a collection of 188 entries comprising landraces and old genotypes and current modern varieties from the Mediterranean basin and elsewhere was tested on moisture-contrasted environments in seven Mediterranean countries, during 2004 and 2005 harvest seasons. The experimental design consisted of an unreplicated trial for all entries, augmented by four repeated checks to which a partial replicate containing a quarter of the entries was added. Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) representing adjusted genotypic means were generated for individual trials using a mixed model. BLUPs were used for genotype by environment interaction analysis using main effect plus genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplots of yield ranked data and for comparisons of landraces, old and modern genotypes using analysis of variance. Mean yields ranged from near crop failure to 6 t/ha. Local landraces were better adapted to environments yielding below 2 t/ha, thus breeding has mostly benefited environments yielding above 2 t/ha where modern genotypes out yielded landraces and old cultivars by 15%. Current barley selection is leading to specifically adapted genotypes.

[1]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Genotype by Environment Interaction and International Breeding Programmes , 1994, Experimental Agriculture.

[2]  R. Lal,et al.  Farmer participation for more effective research in sustainable agriculture. , 1993 .

[3]  A. Rosielle,et al.  Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment 1 , 1981 .

[4]  Jordi Voltas,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain , 1999 .

[5]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[6]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Selection environment and environmental sensitivity in barley , 1991, Euphytica.

[7]  Hans-Peter Piepho,et al.  A Note on the Analysis of Designed Experiments with Complex Treatment Structure , 2006 .

[8]  Allan Booth,et al.  A comparison of sequence-based polymorphism and haplotype content in transcribed and anonymous regions of the barley genome. , 2004, Genome.

[9]  M. Huehn Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability . Part 2 , 1990 .

[10]  Jordi Voltas,et al.  Does higher yield potential improve barley performance in Mediterranean conditions?: A case study , 2005 .

[11]  R. Richards,et al.  Breeding Opportunities for Increasing the Efficiency of Water Use and Crop Yield in Temperate Cereals. , 2002, Crop science.

[12]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  PARTICIPATORY PLANT BREEDING IN WATER-LIMITED ENVIRONMENTS , 2007, Experimental Agriculture.

[13]  Weikai Yan,et al.  Cultivar Evaluation and Mega‐Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot , 2000 .

[14]  M. Huehn Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory , 1990, Euphytica.

[15]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Estimation of heritability using variety trials data from incomplete blocks , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[16]  A. C. Zeven Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications , 1998, Euphytica.

[17]  I. Romagosa,et al.  Genotype by environment interaction and adaptation in barley breeding: basic concepts and methods of analysis , 2002 .

[18]  A. E. Ainsley,et al.  A Method for Predicting the Efficiency of Incomplete-Block Trials , 1987 .

[19]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research , 2007, Euphytica.

[20]  S. Ceccarelli Wide adaptation: How wide? , 1989, Euphytica.

[21]  P. N. Fox,et al.  Genotype × environment interaction and adaptation , 1993 .

[22]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[23]  R. A. Forsberg,et al.  Selection for Sustained Production in Water-Deficit Environments , 1993 .

[24]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interactions in relation to sustainability and biodiversity. , 1996 .

[25]  M. Cooper,et al.  Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  M. Bellon Crop research to benefit poor farmers in marginal areas of the developing world: a review of technical challenges and tools , 2006 .

[27]  S. Fukai,et al.  Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice , 1995 .

[28]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Traits associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall environments , 1991, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[29]  J. Araus,et al.  Changes over time in the adaptation of barley releases in north-eastern Spain , 1998 .

[30]  R. J. Baker TESTS FOR CROSSOVER GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENTAL INTERACTIONS , 1988 .

[31]  M. Cooper,et al.  Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement - a fundamental challenge , 1996 .