Avoid suboptimal perioperative analgesia during major surgery by enhancing thoracic epidural catheter placement and hemodynamic performance

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an established gold standard for postoperative pain control especially following laparotomy and thoracotomy. The safety and efficacy of TEA is well known when the attention to patient selection is upheld. Recently, the use of fascial plane blocks (FPBs) has evolved as an alternative to TEA most likely because these blocks avoid problems such as neurological comorbidity, coagulation disorders, epidural catheter failure and hypotension due to sympathetic denervation. However, if an FPB is performed, postoperative monitoring and adjuvant treatments are still necessary. Also, the true efficacy of FPBs is questioned. Thus, should we prioritize less efficient analgesic regimens with FPBs when preventive treatment strategies for epidural catheter failure and hypotension exist for TEA? It is time to promote and underscore the benefits of TEA provided to patients undergoing major open surgical procedures. In our mind, FPBs and landmark-guided techniques should be limited to less extensive surgery and when either neuraxial blockade is contraindicated or resources for optimal epidural catheter placement and maintenance are not available.

[1]  Guo Mu,et al.  Comparison of analgesic efficacy of continuous transversus abdominis plane block with continuous epidural analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, The Journal of international medical research.

[2]  A. Taenzer,et al.  Thoracic caudal epidural catheter localization using ultrasound guidance , 2019, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[3]  D. Pöpping,et al.  Is epidural analgesia still a viable option for enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery , 2018, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[4]  E. Albrecht,et al.  The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia , 2018, Medicine.

[5]  B. Sites,et al.  Imaging Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement. , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  D. Radovanovic,et al.  Thoracic Epidural Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Open Colorectal Cancer Surgery. , 2017, Acta clinica Croatica.

[7]  Jeremiah R. Brown,et al.  Fluoroscopic Guidance Increases the Incidence of Thoracic Epidural Catheter Placement Within the Epidural Space: A Randomized Trial , 2016, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[8]  B. Sites,et al.  Fluoroscopy‐assisted epidural catheter placement: an exploratory analysis of 303 pre‐operative epidurograms , 2016, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  N. Rawal Current issues in postoperative pain management. , 2016, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[10]  Pedro Tanaka,et al.  Control of pain through epidural block and incidence of cardiac dysrhythmias in postoperative period of thoracic and major abdominal surgical procedures: a comparative study. , 2012, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[11]  Ki Jinn Chin,et al.  Ultrasonography of the Adult Thoracic and Lumbar Spine for Central Neuraxial Blockade , 2011, Anesthesiology.

[12]  A. Senagore,et al.  Postoperative ileus: it costs more than you expect. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[14]  F. Carli,et al.  The physiological effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia on the cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. , 2008, Minerva anestesiologica.

[15]  R. Page,et al.  The Effect of Thoracic Epidural Bupivacaine and an Intravenous Adrenaline Infusion on Gastric Tube Blood Flow During Esophagectomy , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  L. Papazian,et al.  Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on gastric blood flow after oesophagectomy , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  S. Kapral,et al.  Epidural catheter placement in children: comparing a novel approach using ultrasound guidance and a standard loss-of-resistance technique. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  M. Nishimori,et al.  Epidural Pain Relief Versus Systemic Opioid-Based Pain Relief for Abdominal Aortic Surgery , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  J. Guay The benefits of adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia: a metaanalysis , 2006, Journal of Anesthesia.

[20]  L. Papazian,et al.  Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic epidural analgesia. , 2005, Chest.

[21]  Å. Rudin,et al.  Thoracic epidural analgesia or intravenous morphine analgesia after thoracoabdominal esophagectomy: a prospective follow-up of 201 patients. , 2005, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[22]  S. Holm,et al.  Effects of High Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Myocardial Blood Flow in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease , 2005, Circulation.

[23]  L. Ready,et al.  Acute Pain: Lessons Learned From 25,000 Patients , 1999, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[24]  P. Ott,et al.  The effect of increasing blood pressure with dopamine on systemic, splanchnic, and lower extremity hemodynamics in patients with acute liver failure. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[25]  L. Norgren,et al.  Dopamine counteracts hypertension during general anesthesia and hypotension during combined thoracic epidural anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery. , 1990, Journal of cardiothoracic anesthesia.

[26]  O. Werner,et al.  Effects of dopamine on intestinal hemodynamics and motility during epidural analgesia in the cat , 1989, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[27]  L. Norgren,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of dopamine during thoracic epidural analgesia in man. , 1987, Anesthesiology.