Automated tuning of a closed-loop hand grasp neuroprosthesis

An automated tuning algorithm was developed to reduce the time and skill required to tune a closed-loop hand grasp neuroprosthesis. The time reduction results from simultaneous tuning of four gain parameters controlling the dynamic response of the system, and from automation of the calculation and decision processes. The method is therefore an automated parallel tuning method, replacing a manual sequential method in which only one parameter at a time was tuned. RMS error between the step input and the grasp output is minimized, with absence of oscillation as a constraint. The difference between the system's RMS ramp tracking errors for the two tuning methods was less than 1% of the ramp size regardless of the initial values of the parameters, implying that the tuning methods were equivalent. However, the parallel tuning method was faster and required fewer trials than the sequential method. The capability of the closed-loop system to regulate grasp output in the presence of disturbances was shown to be better than the capability without feedback.<<ETX>>

[1]  M. Keith,et al.  Functional neuromuscular stimulation neuroprostheses for the tetraplegic hand. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  P. Crago,et al.  Modulation of Muscle Force by Recruitment During Intramuscular Stimulation , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  K.L. Kilgore,et al.  Synthesis of hand grasp using functional neuromuscular stimulation , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R E Kronauer,et al.  Using a comb filter to describe time-varying biological rhythmicities. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[5]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  A Programming And Data Retrieval System For An Upper Extremity FES Neuroprosthesis , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Force During Electrical Stimulation of Muscle , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Donald E. Gustafson,et al.  ECG/VCG Rhythm Diagnosis Using Statistical Signal Analysis-I. Identification of Persistent Rhythms , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  R E Kronauer,et al.  Methods for identifying respiratory oscillations disclose altitude effects. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[9]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  A multichannel FES system for the restoration of motor functions in high spinal cord injury patients: a respiration-controlled system for multijoint upper extremity , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  Restoration of functional control by electrical stimulation in the upper extremity of the quadriplegic patient. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  W.K. Durfee,et al.  Task-based methods for evaluating electrically stimulated antagonist muscle controllers , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  J T Mortimer,et al.  Muscle plasticity: comparison of a 30-Hz burst with 10-Hz continuous stimulation. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Michel A. Lemay,et al.  External Control of Limb Movements Involving Environmental Interactions , 1990 .

[14]  H.J. Chizeck,et al.  Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  H.J. Chizeck,et al.  Robust closed-loop control of isometric muscle force using pulsewidth modulation , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Implantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  L. A. Bernotas,et al.  Adaptive Control of Electrically Stimulated Muscle , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.