Long-Term Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Mushroom Configuration Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty

Purpose: To review the long-term outcomes after femtosecond laser (FSL)–assisted mushroom configuration deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Methods: Noncomparative case series of 19 eyes from 19 patients who underwent FSL-assisted mushroom configuration DALK. Results: Data were available for 14 eyes at 1 month, for 14 at 3 months, for 16 at 6 months, for 10 at 9 months, and for 8 at 1 year. Preoperative mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/108 (range: 20/30–20/400). At 3 months, the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/46 (range: 20/25–20/250), and at a mean final follow-up of 13 months (range: 6–29) it was 20/35 (range: 20/15–20/200). The greatest change in mean spherical equivalent was at 3 months [−2.29 diopters (D), range: −7.38 to +3.38 D; from −9.54 D, range: −20.00 to +3.38 D, preoperatively]. There was 56% reduction in mean keratometric cylinder at 6 months (4.00 D, range: 1.04–8.75 D; from 9.13 D, range: 0.50–18.75 D, preoperatively). Complications included 3 cases (15.8%) of small Descemet membrane perforation, none of which required conversion to penetrating keratoplasty; 3 cases (15.8%) of stromal rejection that resolved with topical steroids; and 6 cases (31.6%) of steroid-related intraocular pressure rise that were treated with topical medications. Selective suture removal was initiated a mean of 3.5 months (range: 1.5–6 months) after surgery. Conclusions: The use of the FSL to perform corneal cuts in a mushroom configuration for DALK is reliable and reproducible. Earlier visual rehabilitation may be possible because of the mechanical stability and wound healing advantages of stepped corneal wounds.

[1]  A. Kubaloğlu,et al.  Traumatic wound dehiscence after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Irit Bahar,et al.  Outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus intralase enabled penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 2011, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[3]  L. Buzzonetti,et al.  Refractive outcome of keratoconus treated by combined femtosecond laser and big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  L. Buzzonetti,et al.  Standardized big‐bubble technique in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty assisted by the femtosecond laser , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  D. Rootman,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Mushroom Configuration Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty , 2010, Cornea.

[6]  S. Feizi,et al.  Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Patients with Keratoconus: Big-Bubble Technique , 2010, Cornea.

[7]  S. Hannush,et al.  Descemetic DALK and Predescemetic DALK: Outcomes in 236 Cases of Keratoconus , 2010, Cornea.

[8]  J. Mehta,et al.  Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Price,et al.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with femtosecond‐laser zigzag incisions , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty performed with the femtosecond laser zigzag incision for the treatment of stromal corneal pathology and ectatic disease. , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  E. Balestrazzi,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-assisted Lamellar Keratoplasty: Early Results , 2008, Cornea.

[12]  J. Mehta,et al.  Future Directions in Lamellar Corneal Transplantation , 2007, Cornea.

[13]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal surgery , 2007, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Ritterband,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Moxifloxacin as an Additive in Optisol-GS a Preservation Medium for Corneal Donor Tissue , 2006, Cornea.

[15]  J. Ball,et al.  Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus , 2006, Eye.

[16]  S. Tuft,et al.  Patterns of rejection after deep lamellar keratoplasty. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[17]  J. Jonas,et al.  Femtosecond laser penetrating keratoplasty with conical incisions and positional spikes. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  Catey Bunce,et al.  Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[19]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  Mohammed Anwar,et al.  Big‐bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  F. Trimarchi,et al.  Deep Lamellar Keratoplasty , 2001, Ophthalmologica.

[22]  M. Terry The Evolution of Lamellar Grafting Techniques Over Twenty-five Years , 2000, Cornea.

[23]  J. Singh,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. , 1999, Cornea.

[24]  Perry S Binder,et al.  A new surgical technique for deep stromal, anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  J. Kirwan,et al.  Corneal endothelial specular microscopy following deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue , 1998, Eye.

[26]  A. Loewenstein,et al.  Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.