Evaluation of three-element MIMO access points based on measurements and ray tracing models

In this paper, the antenna performance for the 5.2 GHz 802.11n network is compared for four different access points with 3 antenna configurations based on the simulated throughput derived from measurements and a ray-tracing model in a two-storey house. The aim here is not only outline a methodology for access point performance that taking account the user equipment orientation, MIMO data streams that can be supported yielding a total throughput metric, but also ascertain the accuracy of the ray tracing model. In order to demonstrate this, two commercial access points are compared with two alternative antenna configurations: an orthogonal array of dipoles and a linear array of vertical dipoles. Radiation patterns, directivity and polarization mix are presented for all access points. Physical layer throughput is computed for all modulation and coding based on the measured spectral responses and simulated channel matrix. Results show the orthogonal dipole array has the best overall performance with the average throughput of 137 Mbps while vertical dipole array works worst with 106 Mbps. The ray tracing model produce results within 8% of differences and more importantly provide the same performance ranking order.

[1]  Chen-Yu Hsieh,et al.  Inverted-F/Slot Integrated Dual-Band Four-Antenna System for WLAN Access Points , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[2]  V. K. Jones,et al.  The 802.11n MIMO-OFDM Standard for Wireless LAN and Beyond , 2006, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[3]  A. Artemenko,et al.  Compact 2.5–2.7 GHz two element MIMO antenna system for modern USB dongle , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[4]  Aidong Men,et al.  An Improved Distributed Video Coding Scheme for Wireless Video Sensor Network , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[5]  Andrew R. Nix,et al.  MIMO–OFDM WLAN Architectures, Area Coverage, and Link Adaptation for Urban Hotspots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  MIMO Wireless Communications , 2007 .

[7]  Lingjian Li,et al.  Wide band suspended plate antenna with high power efficiency for Green communications , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[8]  Jørgen Bach Andersen,et al.  Array gain and capacity for known random channels with multiple element arrays at both ends , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Di Kong,et al.  Closed-Loop Antenna Selection for Wireless LANs with Directional & Omni-Directional Elements , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[10]  J. P. McGeehan,et al.  Site specific prediction and measurement of indoor power delay and power azimuth spectra at 5 GHz , 2001, IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Fall 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37211).

[11]  G.F. Tsachtsiris,et al.  Integrating Compact Printed Antennas Onto Small Diversity/MIMO Terminals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[12]  Virtual Bridged,et al.  IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Specification for 802.3 Full Duplex Operation , 1997, IEEE Std 802.3x-1997 and IEEE Std 802.3y-1997 (Supplement to ISO/IEC 8802-3: 1996/ANSI/IEEE Std 802.3, 1996 Edition).

[13]  J. P. McGeehan,et al.  Influence of body proximity on the efficiency of a wearable textile patch antenna , 2012, 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[14]  Yi-Chieh Lin,et al.  A MIMO antenna with built-in isolation for WLAN USB dongle applications , 2013, 2013 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference Proceedings (APMC).

[15]  T. Le-Ngoc,et al.  Miniaturized Four-Element Diversity PIFA , 2013, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.