Using Operational Scenarios in a Virtual Reality Enhanced Design Process

Maritime user interfaces for ships’ bridges are highly dependent on the context in which they are used, and rich maritime context is difficult to recreate in the early stages of user-centered design processes. Operations in Arctic waters where crews are faced with extreme environmental conditions, technology limitations and a lack of accurate navigational information further increase this challenge. There is a lack of research supporting the user-centered design of workplaces for hazardous Arctic operations. To meet this challenge, this paper reports on the process of developing virtual reality-reconstructed operational scenarios to connect stakeholders, end-users, designers, and human factors specialists in a joint process. This paper explores how virtual reality-reconstructed operational scenarios can be used as a tool both for concept development and user testing. Three operational scenarios were developed, implemented in a full mission bridge simulator, recreated in virtual reality (VR), and finally tested on navigators (end-users). Qualitative data were captured throughout the design process and user-testing, resulting in a thematic analysis that identified common themes reflecting the experiences gained throughout this process. In conclusion, we argue that operational scenarios, rendered in immersive media such as VR, may be an important and reusable asset when supporting maritime design processes and in maritime training and education.

[1]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Testing and validating Extended Reality (xR) technologies in manufacturing , 2018 .

[2]  Zaili Yang,et al.  Operator Training for Non-Technical Skills in Process Industry , 2020 .

[3]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Preventing Unruly Technologies in Maritime Navigation: A Systems Approach , 2020 .

[4]  Mingming Fan Practices and Challenges of Using Think-Aloud Protocols in Industry: An International Survey , 2020 .

[5]  Charlott Sellberg,et al.  Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis , 2017 .

[6]  H. Carnahan,et al.  Arctic Search and Rescue: A Case Study for Understanding Issues Related to Training and Human Factors When Working in the North , 2020 .

[7]  Salman Nazir,et al.  Effectiveness of VR Head Mounted Displays in Professional Training: A Systematic Review , 2021, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[8]  J F Suri,et al.  Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety in shipping: the human element. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Yushan Pan,et al.  Making Sense of Maritime Simulators Use: A Multiple Case Study in Norway , 2020 .

[11]  Thomas F. Sanquist,et al.  Human Factors in Maritime Applications: A New Opportunity for Multi-Modal Transportation Research , 1992 .

[12]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  Gaps between users and designers: A usability study about a tablet-based application used on ship bridges , 2018 .

[13]  Katie Aylward,et al.  Automated Functions: Their Potential for Impact Upon Maritime Sociotechnical Systems , 2020 .

[14]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  On Your Watch: Automation on the Bridge , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[15]  Salman Nazir,et al.  Rethinking Maritime Education, Training, and Operations in the Digital Era: Applications for Emerging Immersive Technologies , 2019, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[16]  Ilker Etikan,et al.  Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling , 2016 .

[17]  H. Turunen,et al.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. , 2013, Nursing & health sciences.

[18]  Christian Weidig,et al.  Virtual Reality as a Collaboration Tool for Factory Planning based on Scenario Technique , 2013 .

[19]  Claire Williams,et al.  Human factors and ergonomics methods in practice: three fundamental constraints , 2016 .

[20]  Anthony Payne,et al.  Bridge , 2005, Nineteenth-Century Music Review.

[21]  Sigrun Lurås,et al.  Layered scenario mapping: a multidimensional mapping technique for collaborative design , 2016 .

[22]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[23]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[25]  Sigrun Lurås,et al.  Meeting the Complex and Unfamiliar: Lessons from Design in the Offshore Industry , 2015 .

[26]  Peter Securius,et al.  Crew-centred Design of Ships – The CyClaDes Project☆ , 2016 .

[27]  Mika Luimula,et al.  Immersive Safe Oceans Technology: Developing Virtual Onboard Training Episodes for Maritime Safety , 2020, Future Internet.

[28]  John C. Knight,et al.  Safety critical systems: challenges and directions , 2002, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2002.

[29]  Monica Lundh,et al.  “Are You Planning to Follow Your Route?” The Effect of Route Exchange on Decision Making, Trust, and Safety , 2020, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[30]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Why do(n't) actors in collaborative design understand each other? An empirical study towards a better understanding of collaborative design , 2007 .

[31]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[32]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Integrating Participatory Practices in Ship Design and Construction , 2017 .

[33]  Kjetil Nordby,et al.  The use and evolution of design methods in professional design practice , 2018, Design Studies.