Complementarity and Cost Reduction: Evidence from the Auto Supply Industry

Over the last 20 years, the success of Japanese manufacturing firms has brought renewed attention to the importance of cost reduction on existing products as a source of productivity growth. This paper uses survey data and field interviews from the auto supply industry to explore the determinants of average-cost reduction for a sample of 171 plants in the United States and Canada between 1988 and 1992. The main result is that the determinants of cost reduction differ markedly between firms which had employee involvement programs in 1988 and firms that did not. The two groups of firms achieved equal amounts of cost reduction, but did so in very different ways. Firms with employee involvement saw their costs fall more if they also had such involvement gained no cost-reduction benefit from these programs; instead, their cost-reduction success was largely a function of increases in volume. These results provide support for Milgrom and Roberts's concept that certain production practices exhibit complementarity.

[1]  M. Aoki.  Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm , 2013 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[4]  Susan Helper,et al.  Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry , 1991, Business History Review.

[5]  John Worthington,et al.  Reinventing the Workplace , 1997 .

[6]  M. Paul,et al.  ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1990 .

[7]  William Lazonick,et al.  Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor , 1992 .

[8]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U. S. auto plants , 1991 .

[9]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[10]  Susan Helper,et al.  Three steps forward, two steps back in automotive supplier relations , 1994 .

[11]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[12]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[13]  Samuel Hollander,et al.  The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants , 1965 .

[14]  B. Wolf.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1991 .

[15]  R. Parkin.  Optimal Employment Security: The Benefits of Labor Market “Imperfections” , 1996 .

[16]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[17]  Susan Helper,et al.  Long-Term Supplier Relations and Product-Market Structure , 1992 .

[18]  K. Clark.  Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[19]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[20]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Beyond Mass Production. , 1994 .

[21]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier Relations in Japan and the United States , 1995 .

[22]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[23]  J. H. Dyer.  How Chrysler Created an American Keiretsu , 1996 .

[24]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economic Analysis of Technological Change , 1983 .

[25]  I. Winfield.  Japanese manufacturing techniques , 1994 .

[26]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  The Road to Root Cause: Shop-Floor Problem-Solving at Three Auto Assembly Plants , 1997 .

[27]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Do U.S. Firms Invest Less in Human Resources?: Training in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[28]  E. Groshen.  Five Reasons Why Wages Vary Among Employers , 1991 .