FAST TRACK PAPER: Seismic tomography of crustal P and S across Eurasia

SUMMARY In this paper, we present inversion results for regional Pg and Sg phases for the Eurasian continent to explore its use for understanding upper crustal velocity structure. Tomographic inversion of traveltimes from first arriving compressional and shear waves for velocity structure has been applied with great success at all length scales, ranging from the laboratory benchtop to the entire Earth, while inversion of later arriving phases has been much more limited. Our inversion is performed using a damped, smoothed LSQR implementation that solves for site and event terms as well as for velocity along great circle paths between the source and receiver. Results are broadly consistent with published upper crustal velocities for Eurasia, with predominantly high velocities in cratonic regions. Generally, but not always, lower velocities are observed in orogenic and extensional areas and in deep sedimentary basins. A spotcomparison of VP/VS from local and regional studies compares well with the ratio of observed Pg to Sg velocities from our study where resolution is high. Resolution is determined through the use of checkerboard tests, and these suggest that in regions where data density is high we can resolve features down to at least 2 ◦ , with 4 ◦ possible over broader areas. rms residual reductions are on the order of 25 per cent for Sg and 30 per cent for Pg.

[1]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[2]  P. Środa,et al.  Lithospheric structure of the western part of the East European Craton investigated by deep seismic profiles , 2010 .

[3]  Shengbiao Hu,et al.  Heat flow in the continental area of China: a new data set , 2000 .

[4]  P. Bedrosian,et al.  Detection of Widespread Fluids in the Tibetan Crust by Magnetotelluric Studies , 2001, Science.

[5]  Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany,et al.  Seismological constraints on the crustal structure beneath the Zagros Mountain belt (Iran) , 2003 .

[6]  Stephen C. Myers,et al.  Epicentre accuracy based on seismic network criteria , 2004 .

[7]  C. Bassin,et al.  The Current Limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America , 2000 .

[8]  K. Priestley,et al.  Crustal velocity structure of the British Isles; a comparison of receiver functions and wide-angle seismic data , 2006 .

[9]  E. Sandvol,et al.  Crustal structure of the Arabian Plate: New constraints from the analysis of teleseismic receiver functions , 2005 .

[10]  S. Rajaure,et al.  Seismic structure of the crust and the upper mantle beneath the Himalayas: Evidence for eclogitization of lower crustal rocks in the Indian Plate , 2008 .

[11]  Walter D. Mooney,et al.  Crustal structure of China from deep seismic sounding profiles , 1998 .

[12]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[13]  A. Velasco,et al.  Improving Regional Seismic Event Location in China , 2001 .

[14]  D. S. Ramesh,et al.  Receiver function images of the central Chugoku region in the Japanese islands using Hi-net data , 2005 .

[15]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  A natural and controlled source seismic profile through the Eastern Alps: TRANSALP [rapid communication] , 2004 .

[16]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Algorithm 583: LSQR: Sparse Linear Equations and Least Squares Problems , 1982, TOMS.

[17]  J. R. Murphy,et al.  A seismic source summary for Soviet peaceful nuclear explosions , 1999 .

[18]  S. Sobolev,et al.  Moho depth and three-dimensional P and S structure of the crust and uppermost mantle in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East derived from tomographic inversion of local ISC data , 2006 .

[19]  Brian J. Mitchell,et al.  Crustal thickness variations in the Aegean region and implications for the extension of continental crust , 2005 .

[20]  G. Selvaggi,et al.  Messina 1908-2008: understanding crust dynamics and subduction in Southern Italy , 2008 .

[21]  Andrea Morelli,et al.  P wave tomography of the mantle under the Alpine-Mediterranean area , 2003 .

[22]  J. Yliniemi,et al.  3-D density model of the crust of southern and central Finland obtained from joint interpretation of the SVEKALAPKO crustal P-wave velocity models and gravity data , 2004 .

[23]  Peter Bormann,et al.  The IASPEI Standard Seismic Phase List , 2003 .

[24]  Walter D. Mooney,et al.  Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A global view , 1995 .

[25]  W. Walter,et al.  Geophysical Models for Nuclear Explosion Monitoring , 2003 .

[26]  H. Thybo,et al.  Seismic tomographic imaging of P- and S-waves velocity perturbations in the upper mantle beneath Iran , 2007 .

[27]  J. Makris.  The crust and upper mantle of the Aegean region from deep seismic soundings , 1978 .

[28]  Constraining velocity and density contrasts across the crust–mantle boundary with receiver function amplitudes , 2007 .

[29]  Y. Aoki,et al.  Lateral variations of crustal seismic attenuation along the INDEPTH profiles in Tibet from Lg Q inversion , 2004 .

[30]  B. Kennett,et al.  Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification , 1991 .

[31]  I. Sanina,et al.  Structure and composition of the crust and upper mantle of the Archean–Proterozoic boundary in the Fennoscandian shield obtained by joint inversion of receiver function and surface wave phase velocity of recording of the SVEKALAPKO array , 2008 .

[32]  D. Sarkar,et al.  Crustal seismic velocity structure in the epicentral region of the Latur earthquake (September 29, 1993), southern India: inferences from modelling of the aftershock seismograms , 1999 .