Limiting heave response of a wave energy device by draft adjustment with upper surface immersion

Abstract Many studies have been published concerning the influence of the immersed shape (in still water) of a floating body on its response and power capture from ocean waves. With a few notable exceptions, much of this analysis has assumed small amplitude motion and linear models have been employed to predict response. The form of the upper surface of such a body has received little attention. Here, we show how the shape of the upper (top) surface of a floating body can be designed to ensure that the response amplitude of the body is within a specified value. This is of considerable importance to the survivability of wave energy devices. The approach used is to achieve a large increase of both natural period and hydrodynamic damping for only a small change of float mass. These two factors impose a hydrodynamic limit on the displacement which may be exploited to avoid the ‘end-stop’ problem often encountered in wave device design. To demonstrate the change of response, experimental measurements are presented of the response of an axisymmetric float with rounded base and conical upper surface with rounded perimeter due to a range of regular, irregular and focused wave conditions. Power extraction is not considered since the mechanically undamped response represents the worst case. In contrast to a simple, straight-sided axisymmetric float, a smaller change of mass is required to satisfy a particular response amplitude limit. Although a significant reduction is not expected, hydrodynamic damping may reduce with increasing physical scale, and this remains to be quantified.

[1]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures , 2008 .

[2]  Tom E. Baldock,et al.  A laboratory study of nonlinear surface waves on water , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Paul M. Hagemeijer,et al.  A New Model For The Kinematics Of Large Ocean Waves-Application As a Design Wave , 1991 .

[4]  Johannes Falnes,et al.  A REVIEW OF WAVE-ENERGY EXTRACTION , 2007 .

[5]  Pengzhi Lin,et al.  A fixed-grid model for simulation of a moving body in free surface flows , 2007 .

[6]  António F.O. Falcão,et al.  Phase control through load control of oscillating-body wave energy converters with hydraulic PTO system , 2008 .

[7]  J. Chick,et al.  European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference , 2009 .

[8]  Martin Greenhow,et al.  Water entry and exit of horizontal circular cylinders , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  Martin Greenhow,et al.  ADDED MASSES FOR CIRCULAR CYLINDERS NEAR OR PENETRATING FLUID BOUNDARIES-- REVIEW, EXTENSION AND APPLICATION TO WATER-ENTRY, -EXIT AND SLAMMING , 1987 .

[10]  Günther Clauss,et al.  Dramas of the sea: episodic waves and their impact on offshore structures , 2002 .

[11]  A. Clément,et al.  Optimal Latching Control of a Wave Energy Device in Regular and Irregular Waves , 2006 .

[12]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  Modelling of hydraulic performance and wave energy extraction by a point absorber in heave , 2004 .

[13]  M. A. Srokosz,et al.  Some relations for bodies in a canal, with an application to wave-power absorption , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  J. Falnes Ocean Waves and Oscillating Systems , 2002 .

[15]  G. P. Thomas,et al.  The Theory Behind the Conversion of Ocean Wave Energy: a Review , 2008 .

[16]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Comparison of Results From Time-domain Simulations And Model Tests of a Water-pumping Wave-power Unit. , 2006 .

[17]  P Nebel,et al.  Maximizing the Efficiency of Wave-Energy Plant Using Complex-Conjugate Control , 1992 .

[18]  Ove T. Gudmestad,et al.  Kinematics Under Extreme Waves , 2006 .

[19]  Joao Cruz,et al.  Ocean Wave Energy: Current Status and Future Prespectives , 2008 .