Regional differences of column aerosol parameters in western Iberian Peninsula

Abstract This study presents a characterization of aerosols columnar properties measured at three different AERONET sites in the western part of the Iberian Peninsula, namely Evora and Cabo da Roca, in Portugal, and Caceres, in Spain, during the period from 2005 to 2010. AERONET level 2.0 products have been analyzed. The comparison of these three stations has great interest because it has not been conducted yet and it allows to characterize the aerosols of a wide region in western Iberian Peninsula by a long-term analysis of their aerosol properties. In addition, it allows analyzing the possible differences in these properties between the three sites located at different distances from the coast. The results show differences between the aerosol optical depth at 440 and 1020 nm at the three stations, being the mean values in Cabo da Roca at 1020 and 440 nm (0.08 and 0.16) slightly higher than in the other two stations (Evora: 0.06 and 0.15; Caceres: 0.05 and 0.14). Greater differences among the three stations are found for the Angstrom exponent values. Thus, Caceres shows the highest mean value (1.33), followed by Evora (1.14) and, finally, by Cabo da Roca (1.00) which exhibits the smallest median α values due to the presence of coarse sea salt particles and high atmospheric humidity. These values are consistent with the values of volume size distribution, exhibiting a greater value of large particles at Cabo da Roca. The mean values of the single scattering albedo ( ω ) have been also analyzed, obtaining higher results as the coast is approached: Cabo da Roca: ω (440) = 0.95; ω (1020) = 0.96, Evora: ω (440) = 0.93; ω (1020) = 0.95 and Caceres: ω (440) = 0.88; ω (1020) = 0.83. The differences between the three stations are explained in terms of the distance to the coast and to the occasional arrival of diverse air masses transporting different aerosol types to each station. One classification method proposed for the study region has been applied to multi-year measurements performed at the three sites and verified by means of daily 120-h back-trajectory analyses of air masses. The most frequent situations observed at all sites include the clean, maritime and continental situations, which account for about 80% or more. The remaining percentage is accounted by the more episodic situations of desert dust (10–14%) and forest fires emissions (3–5%). The probability density plots calculated for the different classified aerosol situations show significant differences consistent with the different paths of the air masses corresponding to each aerosol situation.

[1]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[2]  H. Sauerzopf,et al.  Optical characteristics of the aerosol in Spain and Austria and its effect on radiative forcing , 2002 .

[3]  R. Draxler An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4 Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition , 1998 .

[4]  Alexander Ignatov,et al.  The lognormal distribution as a reference for reporting aerosol optical depth statistics; Empirical tests using multi‐year, multi‐site AERONET Sunphotometer data , 2000 .

[5]  R. Draxler HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website , 2010 .

[6]  G. Gobbi,et al.  Aerosol seasonal variability over the Mediterranean region and relative impact of maritime, continental and Saharan dust particles over the basin from MODIS data in the year 2001 , 2004 .

[7]  A. Alcantara,et al.  Atmospheric aerosols during the 2003 heat wave in southeastern Spain I: Spectral optical depth , 2006 .

[8]  Ana Maria Silva,et al.  Scattering properties and mass concentration of local and long-range transported aerosols over the South Western Iberia Peninsula , 2008 .

[9]  A. Berjón,et al.  Columnar aerosol optical properties during El Arenosillo 2004 summer campaign , 2008 .

[10]  Oleg Dubovik,et al.  Angstrom exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions , 2006 .

[11]  Derek M. Cunnold,et al.  Observations of 1,1‐difluoroethane (HFC‐152a) at AGAGE and SOGE monitoring stations in 1994–2004 and derived global and regional emission estimates , 2007 .

[12]  G. Kallos,et al.  Saharan dust contributions to PM10 and TSP levels in Southern and Eastern Spain , 2001 .

[13]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[14]  Maria João Costa,et al.  Direct SW aerosol radiative forcing over Portugal , 2008 .

[15]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Physical and optical properties of aerosols over an urban location in Spain: seasonal and diurnal variability , 2009 .

[16]  María P. Utrillas,et al.  Influence of air mass history on the columnar aerosol properties at Valencia, Spain , 2007 .

[17]  Dimitris G. Kaskaoutis,et al.  Aerosol climatology and discrimination of different types over Athens, Greece, based on MODIS data , 2007 .

[18]  D. Dockery,et al.  Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. , 1994, Annual review of public health.

[19]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Columnar physical and radiative properties of atmospheric aerosols in north central Spain , 2000 .

[20]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[21]  Ana Maria Silva,et al.  Seven years of measurements of aerosol scattering properties, near the surface, in the southwestern Iberia Peninsula , 2010 .

[22]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Airmass Classification and Analysis of Aerosol Types at El Arenosillo (Spain) , 2009 .

[23]  Michael D. King,et al.  A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[24]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[25]  V. Cachorro,et al.  Measurements of the atmospheric turbidity of the North-centre continental area in Spain: spectral aerosol optical depth and Ångström turbidity parameters , 2000 .

[26]  A. Alcantara,et al.  Atmospheric aerosols during the 2003 heat wave in southeastern Spain II: Microphysical columnar properties and radiative forcing , 2006 .

[27]  Oleg Dubovik,et al.  Non‐spherical aerosol retrieval method employing light scattering by spheroids , 2002 .

[28]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Columnar characteristics of aerosols by spectroradiometer measurements in the maritime area of the Cadiz Gulf (Spain) , 2005 .

[29]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Column-integrated aerosol microphysical properties from AERONET Sun photometer over Southwestern Spain , 2011 .

[30]  María P. Utrillas,et al.  Columnar aerosol properties in Valencia (Spain) by ground‐based Sun photometry , 2007 .

[31]  Maria João Costa,et al.  Aerosol optical properties from columnar data during the second Aerosol Characterization Experiment on the south coast of Portugal , 2002 .

[32]  D. I. Sebacher,et al.  Distribution and geochemistry of aerosols in the tropical north Atlantic troposphere: Relationship to Saharan dust , 1986 .

[33]  T. Eck,et al.  Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[34]  Ana Maria Silva,et al.  Some considerations about Ångström exponent distributions , 2007 .

[35]  A. Muxworthy,et al.  Configurational anisotropy in single‐domain and pseudosingle‐domain grains of magnetite , 2006 .

[36]  Victoria E. Cachorro,et al.  Aerosol optical depth and Ångström exponent climatology at El Arenosillo AERONET site (Huelva, Spain) , 2007 .

[37]  Ana Maria Silva,et al.  Aerosol extinction in a remote continental region of the Iberian Peninsula during summer , 2006 .

[38]  Robert Frouin,et al.  Maritime aerosol optical thickness measured by handheld sun photometers , 2004 .