RM5Tree: Radial basis M5 model tree for accurate structural reliability analysis

Abstract The surrogate models-based prediction of performance functions is an efficient and accurate methodology in structural reliability analyses. In this paper, the M5 model tree (M5Tree) is improved based on radial basis training data set and it is named as Radial basis M5Tree (RM5Tree). To predict the performance function, the random input variables are transferred from ordinal space to radial space using several effective points for nonlinear calibrated model of RM5Tree. The input datasets are controlled using the radial dataset for high-dimensional reliability problems to reduce computational efforts to evaluate the performance function. The abilities of RM5Tree using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) with respect to accuracy and efficiency are investigated through five nonlinear reliability problems. The results indicate that the proposed RM5Tree performs superior manner in accuracy and efficiency compared to the M5Tree, response surface method (RSM) and first order reliability method.

[1]  Mahesh Pal,et al.  M5 model tree for land cover classification , 2006 .

[2]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[3]  C. Soares,et al.  Response surface approach to the probability distribution of the strength of compressed plates , 2002 .

[4]  Mansour Bagheri,et al.  Fuzzy relaxed-finite step size method to enhance the instability of the fuzzy first-order reliability method using conjugate discrete map , 2018 .

[5]  Qiujing Pan,et al.  An efficient reliability method combining adaptive Support Vector Machine and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2017 .

[6]  Shang-Liang Chen,et al.  Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[7]  Hailong Zhao,et al.  An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel , 2015 .

[8]  M. Miri,et al.  A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point , 2012 .

[9]  Â. Teixeira,et al.  Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis , 2014 .

[10]  Isaac Elishakoff,et al.  Refined second-order reliability analysis☆ , 1994 .

[11]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Reliability Analysis With Monte Carlo Simulation and Dependent Kriging Predictions , 2016 .

[13]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 1996 .

[14]  Yasuhiro Mori,et al.  Time-dependent system reliability analysis by adaptive importance sampling , 1993 .

[15]  Olivier P. Le Maître,et al.  Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  S. Chakraborty,et al.  Reliability analysis of structures by iterative improved response surface method , 2016 .

[18]  Franck Schoefs,et al.  Principal component analysis and polynomial chaos expansion for time-variant reliability problems , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Peng Hao,et al.  Enriched self-adjusted performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization of complex engineering problems , 2018 .

[20]  Hao Zhang,et al.  A Multiwavelet Neural Network‐Based Response Surface Method for Structural Reliability Analysis , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[21]  Chao Jiang,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of structural systems under hybrid probabilistic and interval model , 2015 .

[22]  B. Keshtegar,et al.  A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis , 2018 .

[23]  D. Solomatine,et al.  Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall—runoff modelling , 2003 .

[24]  Pedro G. Coelho,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[25]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[26]  Wang Jian,et al.  Two accuracy measures of the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[27]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[28]  Hongzhe Dai,et al.  A multiwavelet support vector regression method for efficient reliability assessment , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Yongchang Pu,et al.  Reliability analysis of structures using neural network method , 2006 .

[30]  Behrooz Keshtegar,et al.  Reliability analysis of low, mid and high-grade strength corroded pipes based on plastic flow theory using adaptive nonlinear conjugate map , 2018, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[31]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Peng Hao,et al.  An efficient adaptive-loop method for non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization , 2017 .

[33]  B. Keshtegar A hybrid conjugate finite-step length method for robust and efficient reliability analysis , 2017 .

[34]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Behrooz Keshtegar,et al.  An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Soo-Chang Kang,et al.  An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis , 2010 .

[37]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[38]  Ali Behnood,et al.  Predicting modulus elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete using M5′ model tree algorithm , 2015 .

[39]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  A response surface method based on support vector machines trained with an adaptive experimental design , 2012 .

[40]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  A general procedure for first/second-order reliabilitymethod (FORM/SORM) , 1999 .

[41]  A. Sellier,et al.  Adaptive response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique , 2009 .

[42]  Hao Zhang,et al.  A support vector density-based importance sampling for reliability assessment , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  B. F. Azar,et al.  Efficient response surface method for high-dimensional structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[44]  Dixiong Yang,et al.  A new directional stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability analysis , 2017 .

[45]  Zhiliang Wang,et al.  Cognitive-affective regulation process for micro-expressions based on Gaussian cloud distribution , 2017, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[46]  José Alí Moreno,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo reliability evaluation using support vector machine , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[47]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[48]  Yi Liu,et al.  Density peaks clustering based integrate framework for multi-document summarization , 2017, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[49]  Hongzhe Dai,et al.  A Wavelet Support Vector Machine‐Based Neural Network Metamodel for Structural Reliability Assessment , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[50]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis , 2012 .

[51]  Peng Hao,et al.  A hybrid descent mean value for accurate and efficient performance measure approach of reliability-based design optimization , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[52]  B. Keshtegar Chaotic conjugate stability transformation method for structural reliability analysis , 2016 .

[53]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[54]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[55]  Bo Wang,et al.  Non-probabilistic reliability-based design optimization of stiffened shells under buckling constraint , 2015 .

[56]  Wang Chien Ming,et al.  A new active learning method based on the learning function U of the AK-MCS reliability analysis method , 2017 .

[57]  Zeng Meng,et al.  A hybrid relaxed first-order reliability method for efficient structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[58]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[59]  李洪双,et al.  SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE FOR STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[60]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .