Toward Improving Surgical Outcomes by Incorporating Cognitive Load Measurement into Process-Driven Guidance

This paper summarizes the accomplishments and recent directions of our medical safety project. Our process-based approach uses a detailed, rigorously-defined, and carefully validated process model to provide a dynamically updated, context-aware and thus, “Smart” Checklist to help process performers understand and manage their pending tasks [7]. This paper focuses on support for teams of performers, working independently as well as in close collaboration, in stressful situations that are life critical. Our recent work has three main thrusts: provide effective real-time guidance for closely collaborating teams; develop and evaluate techniques for measuring cognitive load based on biometric observations and human surveys; and, using these measurements plus analysis and discrete event process simulation, predict cognitive load throughout the process model and propose process modifications to help performers better manage high cognitive load situations. This project is a collaboration among software engineers, surgical team members, human factors researchers, and medical equipment instrumentation experts. Experimental prototype capabilities are being built and evaluated based upon process models of two cardiovascular surgery processes, Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). In this paper we describe our approach for each of the three research thrusts by illustrating our work for heparinization, a common subprocess of both AVR and CABG. Heparinization is a high-risk error-prone procedure that involves complex team interactions and thus highlights the importance of this work for improving patient outcomes.

[1]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  A Systems Approach to Analyzing and Preventing Hospital Adverse Events , 2016, Journal of patient safety.

[2]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Surgical data science for next-generation interventions , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. , 2007, Surgery.

[4]  P. Maurette [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  J. Robbins,et al.  Hospital Checklists , 2011, Critical care nursing quarterly.

[7]  David Raffo Software Process Simulation Modeling (ProSim'98): Workshop Report , 2004, Empirical Software Engineering.

[8]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Shan Nan,et al.  A meta-model for computer executable dynamic clinical safety checklists , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[10]  Yuriy Brun,et al.  Specification and Analysis of Human-Intensive System Resource-Utilization Policies , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering in Healthcare Systems (SEHS).

[11]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Development and Validation of a Surgical Workload Measure: The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  C. Greenberg,et al.  Heparin Sensitivity and Resistance: Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass , 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Distributed cognition: An alternative model of cognition for medical informatics , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  John E. Ziewacz,et al.  Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  P. Pronovost,et al.  The checklist--a tool for error management and performance improvement. , 2006, Journal of critical care.

[16]  Dietmar Pfahl,et al.  Software Process Simulation Modeling: An Extended Systematic Review , 2010, ICSP.

[17]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Patient Safety in the Cardiac Operating Room: Human Factors and Teamwork A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation.

[18]  Nicolai Schoch,et al.  Surgical Data Science: Enabling Next-Generation Surgery , 2017, ArXiv.

[19]  Daniel Boorman,et al.  TODAY'S ELECTRONIC CHECKLISTS REDUCE LIKELIHOOD OF CREW ERRORS AND HELP PREVENT MISHAPS , 2001 .

[20]  D. Stub,et al.  Trauma Resuscitation Errors and Computer-assisted Decision Support , 2011 .

[21]  Robert A Baker,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines-Anticoagulation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  George S. Avrunin,et al.  Smart Checklists to Improve Healthcare Outcomes , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Engineering in Healthcare Systems (SEHS).

[23]  Leon J. Osterweil,et al.  Resource Management for Complex, Dynamic Environments , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[24]  M. Zenati,et al.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Methodological framework for evaluating clinical processes: A cognitive informatics perspective , 2016, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[26]  David Arney,et al.  OpenICE medical device interoperability platform overview and requirement analysis , 2018, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[27]  Raymond J. Madachy,et al.  Software process simulation modeling: Why? What? How? , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[28]  Leon J. Osterweil,et al.  Little-JIL/Juliette: a process definition language and interpreter , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[29]  Marco A Zenati,et al.  Computer-Assisted Process Modeling to Enhance Intraoperative Safety in Cardiac Surgery. , 2016, JAMA surgery.

[30]  George S. Avrunin,et al.  Experience modeling and analyzing medical processes: UMass/baystate medical safety project overview , 2010, IHI.

[31]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  Surgical process modelling: a review , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[32]  Anil V Parwani,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[33]  George S. Avrunin,et al.  Cognitive support during high-consequence episodes of care in cardiovascular surgery , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA).

[34]  Marco A. Zenati,et al.  An artificial system for selecting the optimal surgical team , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[35]  Insup Lee,et al.  Improving Patient Safety with X-Ray and Anesthesia Machine Ventilator Synchronization: A Medical Device Interoperability Case Study , 2009, BIOSTEC.