Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) as a Bridge Between Engineering Education Research and Mathematics Education Research

This article introduces Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) as a form of case study team problem-solving. MEA design focuses on eliciting from students conceptual models that they iteratively revise in problem-solving. Though developed by mathematics education researchers to study the evolution of mathematical problem-solving expertise in middle school students, MEAs are increasingly used in undergraduate engineering at the introductory course level, and are the subject of several NSF grants to expand their implementation. A primary implementation challenge involves finding appropriate blends of MEAs with other pedagogies. Current research and development efforts include five areas of expanding the theoretical and empirical scope of the MEA construct. These include development and use of Reflection Tools, a device to nurture problem-solving personalities; implementation of current and futuristic learning technologies; elicitation and repair of misconceptions among undergraduates; development of engineering students’ ethical frameworks; and implementation of the elicitation model in higher level engineering courses.

[1]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Toward a Rapid Development Environment for Cognitive Tutors , 2003 .

[2]  T.J. Moore,et al.  Assessment of Team Effectiveness During Complex Mathematical Modeling Tasks , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[3]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[4]  Levent Yilmaz,et al.  Expanding Our Horizons in Teaching the Use of Intelligent Agents for Simulation Modeling of Next Generation Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[5]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  Achieving Parity of the Sexes at the Undergraduate Level: A Study of Success , 2007 .

[6]  Shirley T Fleischmann.  Essential ethics — embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum , 2004, Science and engineering ethics.

[7]  Mark N. Hoover,et al.  Principles for Developing Thought-Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers , 2000 .

[8]  José A Cruz,et al.  An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[9]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Measuring Cognitive Growth In Engineering Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study , 2001 .

[10]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? , 2005 .

[11]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[12]  Cindy E. Foor,et al.  “I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:” Achieving Individual Diversity , 2007 .

[13]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Quantifying Aluminum Crystal Size Part 2: The Model-Development Sequence. , 2006 .

[14]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator , 2006 .

[15]  Jennifer L. Jolly,et al.  Recent dissertation research in gifted studies , 2005 .

[16]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Access to Constructivist and Didactic Teaching: Who Gets It? Where Is It Practiced?. , 1999 .

[17]  David F. Labaree,et al.  Educational Researchers: Living With a Lesser Form of Knowledge , 1998 .

[18]  Jack R. Lohmann,et al.  Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers , 2006 .

[19]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[20]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[21]  Graham D. Hendry,et al.  Constructivism and Problem‐based Learning , 1999 .

[22]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  Misconceptions About Rate Processes: Preliminary Evidence For The Importance Of Emergent Conceptual Schemas In Thermal And Transport Sciences , 2006 .

[23]  Julie Gainsburg.  The Mathematical Modeling of Structural Engineers , 2006 .

[24]  P.K. Imbrie,et al.  A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: model-eliciting activities , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[25]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design, Assessment, and Evaluation of a Problem‐based Learning Environment in Undergraduate Engineering , 1999 .

[26]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Problem Solving, Modeling, and Local Conceptual Development , 2003 .

[27]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Research Design in Mathematics Education: Focusing on Design Experiments , 2002 .

[28]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching , 2003 .

[29]  Richard Lesh,et al.  A Models and Modeling Perspective on Problem Solving , 2003 .

[30]  William O. Martin,et al.  Small-group searches for mathematical proofs and individual reconstructions of mathematical concepts , 2004 .

[31]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Transformative Teaching Experiments through Conjecture-Driven Research Design. , 2000 .

[32]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Integrated Mathematics and Science Teacher Education Courses: A Modelling Perspective , 2006 .

[33]  Margaret C Lohman,et al.  Designing cases in problem-based learning to foster problem-solving skill. , 2002, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[34]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[35]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[36]  Andrew Stapleton,et al.  Research as Design-Design as Research , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[37]  Sandra Courter,et al.  Globalization And Engineering Education For 2020 , 2007 .

[38]  Chris Dede,et al.  Model-Based Teaching and Learning with BioLogica™: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know? , 2004 .

[39]  Peter Galbraith,et al.  Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics - ICTMA 12 , 2007 .

[40]  Sherwyn P. Morreale,et al.  Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 2023 .

[41]  H. Diefes-Dux,et al.  Developing model-eliciting activities for undergraduate students based on advanced engineering content , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[42]  David G. Wareham,et al.  Introducing ethics using structured controversies , 2006 .

[43]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations , 2005 .

[44]  Loucas T. Louca,et al.  Epistemological Resources: Applying a New Epistemological Framework to Science Instruction , 2004 .

[45]  Nsf Proposal Number.  Collaborative Research: Impact of Model-Eliciting Activities on Engineering Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[46]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  How computer games help children learn , 2008 .

[47]  Mary L Cummings,et al.  Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[48]  Eric R. Hamilton.  Principles and grand challenges for the future: a prospectus for the computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) community , 2007, CSCL.

[49]  Louis J. Lanunziata,et al.  Direct instruction: Its contributions to high school achievement. , 2000 .

[50]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Quantifying Aluminum Crystal Size Part 1: The Model-Eliciting Activity. , 2006 .

[51]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based research strategies for studying situated learning in a multi-user virtual environment , 2004 .

[52]  Scott A. Chamberlin,et al.  Model-Eliciting Activities as a Tool to Develop and Identify Creatively Gifted Mathematicians , 2005 .

[53]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Software for Measuring the Intellectual Development of Students: Advantages and Limitations , 2002 .

[54]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[55]  Frank Bullen,et al.  The broad and strategic value of the freshmen engineering experience-FEE* , 2006 .

[56]  William A. Crossley,et al.  SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS: AN INTRODUCTION OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY SCHOOLS OF ENGINEERING’S SIGNATURE AREA , 2004 .

[57]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently , 2006 .

[58]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[59]  Michelle T. Chamberlin.  Teachers’ Discussions Of Students’ Thinking: Meeting The Challenge Of Attending To Students’ Thinking , 2005 .

[60]  Jill D. Crisman,et al.  'Kinetic Sculptures': A Centerpiece Project Integrated with Mathematics and Physics* , 2006 .

[61]  Jack R. Lohmann,et al.  Building a Community of Scholars: The Role of the Journal of Engineering Education as a Research Journal , 2005 .

[62]  Norrie S. Edward.  Evaluations of introducing project-based design activities in the first and second years of engineering courses , 2004 .

[63]  Roberta Y. Schorr,et al.  Using a Modeling Approach to Analyze the Ways in Which Teachers Consider New Ways to Teach Mathematics , 2003 .

[64]  Sylvia Louise Kinzer Blanchfield,et al.  Recent dissertation research in gifted studies , 2004 .

[65]  Richard Lesh,et al.  A Models and Modeling Perspective on Metacognitive Functioning in Everyday Situations Where Problem Solvers Develop Mathematical Constructs , 2003 .