Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results.

This study presents various acoustic measures used to examine the sequence /a # C/, where "#" represents different prosodic boundaries in French. The 6 consonants studied are /b d g f s S/ (3 stops and 3 fricatives). The prosodic units investigated are the utterance, the intonational phrase, the accentual phrase, and the word. It is found that vowel target values, formant transitions into the stop consonant, and the rate of change in spectral tilt into the fricative, are affected by the strength of the prosodic boundary. F1 becomes higher for /a/ the stronger the prosodic boundary, with the exception of one speaker's utterance data, which show the effects of articulatory declension at the utterance level. Various effects of the stop consonant context are observed, the most notable being a tendency for the vowel /a/ to be displaced in the direction of the F2 consonant "locus" for /d/ (the F2 consonant values for which remain relatively stable across prosodic boundaries) and for /g/ (the F2 consonant values for which are displaced in the direction of the velar locus in weaker prosodic boundaries, together with those of the vowel). Velocity of formant transition may be affected by prosodic boundary (with greater velocity at weaker boundaries), though results are not consistent across speakers. There is also a tendency for the rate of change in spectral tilt moving from the vowel to the fricative to be affected by the presence of a prosodic boundary, with a greater rate of change at the weaker prosodic boundaries. It is suggested that spectral cues, in addition to duration, amplitude, and F0 cues, may alert listeners to the presence of a prosodic boundary.

[1]  K. Harris Cues for the Discrimination of American English Fricatives in Spoken Syllables , 1958 .

[2]  H. Levene Robust tests for equality of variances , 1961 .

[3]  B. Lindblom Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[4]  S. Öhman Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[5]  I. Lehiste The Timing of Utterances and Linguistic Boundaries , 1972 .

[6]  A. Butcher,et al.  An electropalatographic investigation of coarticulation in VCV sequences , 1976 .

[7]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction , 1978 .

[9]  S. Blumstein,et al.  A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: evidence from a cross-language study. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[11]  J. Fletcher Rhythm and final lengthening in French , 1991 .

[12]  C A Fowler,et al.  Declination of Supralaryngeal Gestures in Spoken Italian , 1992, Phonetica.

[13]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  The mu + system for corpus based speech research , 1993, Comput. Speech Lang..

[14]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[15]  J. Sawusch,et al.  The processing of duration and intensity cues to prominence. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure , 1996 .

[17]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[18]  R. Smits,et al.  Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Rate effects on French intonation: prosodic organization and phonetic realization , 1998 .

[21]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries , 1998 .

[22]  Laurence White,et al.  Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English , 1999 .

[23]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[24]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Articulatory Vowel Lengthening and Coordination at Phrasal Junctures , 2000, Phonetica.

[26]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Acoustic Vowel Reduction in Creek: Effects of Distinctive Length and Position in the Word , 2000, Phonetica.

[27]  A method for studying variability in fricatives using time‐dependent changes in spectral mean , 2001 .

[28]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system , 2001, Speech Commun..

[29]  Cécile Fougeron,et al.  Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[30]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[31]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .

[32]  B Munson A method for studying variability in fricatives using dynamic measures of spectral mean. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  M. Tabain,et al.  Variability in Fricative Production and Spectra , 2001, Language and speech.

[34]  Johan Wouters,et al.  Effects of prosodic factors on spectral dynamics. I. Analysis. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.