Figure/Ground Segmentation via a Haptic Glance: Attributing Initial Finger Contacts to Objects or Their Supporting Surfaces

The current study addresses the well-known “figure/ground” problem in human perception, a fundamental topic that has received surprisingly little attention from touch scientists to date. Our approach is grounded in, and directly guided by, current knowledge concerning the nature of haptic processing. Given inherent figure/ground ambiguity in natural scenes and limited sensory inputs from first contact (a “haptic glance”), we consider first whether people are even capable of differentiating figure from ground (Experiments 1 and 2). Participants were required to estimate the strength of their subjective impression that they were feeling an object (i.e., figure) as opposed to just the supporting structure (i.e., ground). Second, we propose a tripartite factor classification scheme to further assess the influence of kinetic, geometric (Experiments 1 and 2), and material (Experiment 2) factors on haptic figure/ground segmentation, complemented by more open-ended subjective responses obtained at the end of the experiment. Collectively, the results indicate that under certain conditions it is possible to segment figure from ground via a single haptic glance with a reasonable degree of certainty, and that all three factor classes influence the estimated likelihood that brief, spatially distributed fingertip contacts represent contact with an object and/or its background supporting structure.

[1]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Boughman,et al.  The World of AJHG , 2007 .

[5]  Philip J. Kellman Visual Perception of Objects and Boundaries: A Four-Dimensional Approach , 2003 .

[6]  John Cohen The World of Touch , 1952, Nature.

[7]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION Simplicity and Likelihood Principles , 1986 .

[8]  A. Wing,et al.  Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  H. Barlow Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology by Stephen E. Palmer , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Eiichi Naito,et al.  Moving tactile stimuli of fingers are integrated in the intraparietal and inferior parietal cortices , 2003, Neuroreport.

[11]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Keith Nesbitt,et al.  Identifying Commonly-Used Gestalt Principles as a Design Framework for Multi-Sensory Displays , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[14]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  R. Johansson,et al.  Control of Grip Force When Tilting Objects: Effect of Curvature of Grasped Surfaces and Applied Tangential Torque , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Local figure-ground cues are valid for natural images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[17]  S J Lederman,et al.  Cognitive Salience of Haptic Object Properties: Role of Modality-Encoding Bias , 1996, Perception.

[18]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[19]  S. Lederman,et al.  Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour. , 1990, Canadian journal of psychology.

[20]  Mary A. Peterson,et al.  On Figures, Grounds, and Varieties of Surface Completion , 2003 .

[21]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[22]  Keith Nesbitt,et al.  The Gestalt Principles of Similarity and Proximity Apply to Both the Haptic and Visual Grouping of Elements , 2007, AUIC.

[23]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[24]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  One, two, three, many - subitizing in active touch. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Ferdinand Pierre Beer,et al.  Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics , 1985 .

[26]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[27]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Constraints on Haptic Integration of Spatially Shared Object Dimensions , 1993, Perception.

[30]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[31]  Keith Nesbitt,et al.  The Gestalt Principle of Continuation Applies to both the Haptic and Visual Grouping of Elements , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[32]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Pictorial Foreground/Background Reversal Reduces Tactual Recognition by Blind Subjects , 1984 .

[33]  A. Kappers,et al.  Haptic pop-out in a hand sweep. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[34]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[36]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.