Predictive elements in ocular interception and tracking of a moving target by untrained cats

Abstract.We presented a mechanical target moving at constant velocity to awake, nontrained, head-restrained cats, in order to study how naive animals pursue objects moving at a high speed with their gaze. Eye movements were recorded while the target was moving in different directions at a constant velocity (20–80°/s) through the center of the visual field. We observed two oculomotor strategies: cats either made an interception saccade (IS) toward the target but opposite to its motion, or tracked it in the direction of motion. They used the interception strategy more frequently when the gaze position error at the onset of target motion was large, and the tracking strategy when it was small. Interception was always achieved by single saccades, which were faster than tracking saccades (TS). During tracking, cats generated sequences of two to six saccades separated by "smooth" eye movements. Tracking quality varied considerably from trial to trial. When the level of motivation was high, cats would track the target at 80°/s over up to 75% of the oculomotor range, with relatively small position errors. We compared ISs and TSs with respect to their metric properties and timing. The amplitudes of ISs positively correlated with position error existing 100 ms before saccade onset, but saccade vectors were directed to a point ahead of the target along the target's track. We conclude that, in programming the ISs, target motion is used to predict the future target position so as to assure a spatial lead of the gaze at the saccade end, instead of attempting a precise capture of the target. The amplitude of TSs did not depend on preceding position errors. TSs were usually small at the onset of the first saccade, as if cats would wait till the target arrived near the line of sight. A majority of primary TSs were initiated before the target arrived near the direction of gaze. Thus they had a direction, opposite to the position error sampled 100 ms before the saccade, but the same as the direction of target motion. Prediction of the future target position from its velocity vector should therefore contribute to the programming of TSs. In addition, we observed that TSs were faster when they were initiated with a spatial lag relative to the target and they were slower if there was a spatial lead or target velocity was reduced. Such a modulation appears to be analogous to the predictive correction of the saccade amplitude during smooth pursuit in primates. Considering strong visual motion sensitivity and motor properties of output neurons of the superior colliculus, it is likely that, in cats, the colliculus makes a major contribution to the integration of eye movement-related and target motion-related signals.

[1]  G. R. Barnes,et al.  28 – A Model of Predictive Processes in Oculomotor Control Based on Experimental Results in Humans , 1994 .

[2]  D. Pélisson,et al.  Control of orienting gaze shifts by the tectoreticulospinal system in the head-free cat. III. Spatiotemporal characteristics of phasic motor discharges. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Stein,et al.  A parametric study of movement detection properties of neurons in the cat's superior colliculus. , 1972, Brain research.

[4]  W. Newsome,et al.  Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  A. Fuchs Saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in the monkey , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Harry J. Wyatt,et al.  Smooth eye movements with step-ramp stimuli: The influence of attention and stimulus extent , 1987, Vision Research.

[8]  C. Scudder,et al.  The microscopic anatomy and physiology of the mammalian saccadic system , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[9]  K. J. W. Craik Theory of the human operator in control systems; the operator as an engineering system. , 1947 .

[10]  A Hughes,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the cat retinal ganglion cell topography , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  Target velocity based prediction in saccadic vector programming , 1989, Vision Research.

[12]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[13]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  Does the brain use sliding variables for the control of movements? , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[16]  A. K. Moschovakis,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of two-dimensional orienting movements in the cat. I. A quantitative study of saccades and slow drifts produced in response to the electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  R. Douglas,et al.  Eye-head coordination in cats. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  D Guitton,et al.  Control of orienting gaze shifts by the tectoreticulospinal system in the head-free cat. I. Identification, localization, and effects of behavior on sensory responses. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Chul E. Kim,et al.  Accuracies of saccades to moving targets: During pursuit initiation and maintenance , 1995, Schizophrenia Research.

[20]  R. Miall,et al.  Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  K. J. Craik THEORY OF THE HUMAN OPERATOR IN CONTROL SYSTEMS , 1948 .

[22]  M. Wallace,et al.  Converging influences from visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices onto output neurons of the superior colliculus. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  E. Keller,et al.  Activity of visuomotor burst neurons in the superior colliculus accompanying express saccades. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  B. Gordon,et al.  Receptive fields in deep layers of cat superior colliculus. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  W T Newsome,et al.  How Is a Sensory Map Read Out? Effects of Microstimulation in Visual Area MT on Saccades and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  C. Bruce,et al.  Deficits in smooth-pursuit eye movements after muscimol inactivation within the primate's frontal eye field. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Simon Heywood,et al.  Saccades to step-ramp stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[28]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[29]  G. Barnes,et al.  The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye movements. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Visual motion processing in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus of the cat. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Smooth pursuit eye movements in response to predictable target motions , 1983, Vision Research.

[32]  N J Gandhi,et al.  Discharge of superior collicular neurons during saccades made to moving targets. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D L Sparks,et al.  Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. , 1986, Physiological reviews.