Protein-ligand docking guided by ligand pharmacophore-mapping experiment by NMR.

We developed a new protein-ligand docking calculation method using experimental NMR data. Recently, we proposed a novel ligand epitope-mapping experiment, which utilizes the difference between the longitudinal relaxation rates of ligand protons with and without irradiation of target protein protons (DIRECTION epitope-mapping experiment; Y. Mizukoshi, et al., An accurate pharmacophore mapping method by NMR, submitted for publication). Although the epitope-mapping experiment is simple and rapid, the result should reflect the proximity of ligand protons to the target protein surface. However, it cannot directly provide the protein-ligand complex structure without any other structural information. While the accuracy of protein-ligand docking software is insufficient, the software can provide many candidate complex structures. In many cases, the correct complex structure is included in the set of predicted complex structures and the correct structures could be selected by applying the above experimental result of ligand epitope mapping. In the current study, we combined the protein-ligand docking software with the NMR experimental information so as to improve the prediction of the protein-ligand complex structure. Consequently, the prediction accuracy was improved by 1.3-1.9 times (from ca. 50% to ca. 70%) in a self-docking test for the simulated epitope mapping result. Moreover, this method was applied to actual NMR experiments, and it successfully reconstructed the protein-ligand complex structures.

[1]  Didier Rognan,et al.  ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein–ligand interactions , 2002, Proteins.

[2]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[3]  Garland R. Marshall,et al.  SKATE: A docking program that decouples systematic sampling from scoring , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  D. E. Clark,et al.  Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity , 1998, Proteins.

[5]  Aurélien Grosdidier,et al.  Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  Robert Kiss,et al.  Virtual Fragment Docking by Glide: a Validation Study on 190 Protein-Fragment Complexes , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Noise Reduction Method for Molecular Interaction Energy: Application to in Silico Drug Screening and in Silico Target Protein Screening. , 2006 .

[8]  Edward R Zartler,et al.  The effect of relaxation on the epitope mapping by saturation transfer difference NMR. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  Ricardo L. Mancera,et al.  Ligand-Protein Cross-Docking with Water Molecules , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Proton magnetic relaxation and spin diffusion in proteins , 1976 .

[11]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[13]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Classification of chemical compounds by protein-compound docking for use in designing a focused library. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Andrea Giachetti,et al.  Combining in silico tools and NMR data to validate protein-ligand structural models: application to matrix metalloproteinases. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  The Filling Potential Method: A Method for Estimating the Free Energy Surface for Protein−Ligand Docking , 2003 .

[17]  Sudipto Mukherjee,et al.  Docking Validation Resources: Protein Family and Ligand Flexibility Experiments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[19]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Cross-saturation and transferred cross-saturation experiments , 2009 .

[21]  Johann Gasteiger,et al.  A new model for calculating atomic charges in molecules , 1978 .

[22]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Reiji Teramoto,et al.  Supervised Consensus Scoring for Docking and Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  P. Colman,et al.  Structure-based drug design. , 1994, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  Song Liu,et al.  A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  ITERATIVE PARTIAL EQUALIZATION OF ORBITAL ELECTRONEGATIVITY – A RAPID ACCESS TO ATOMIC CHARGES , 1980 .

[27]  Yongbo Hu,et al.  Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[28]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[29]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  An accurate pharmacophore mapping method by NMR spectroscopy. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.

[31]  N. Krishna,et al.  Complete relaxation and conformational exchange matrix (CORCEMA) analysis of intermolecular saturation transfer effects in reversibly forming ligand-receptor complexes. , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[32]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Model building of a protein-protein complexed structure using saturation transfer and residual dipolar coupling without paired intermolecular NOE , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[34]  K. Ono,et al.  Structural basis for platelet antiaggregation by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan (DuP-753) via glycoprotein VI. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  J. Janin Assessing predictions of protein–protein interaction: The CAPRI experiment , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  Hideo Takahashi,et al.  A novel NMR method for determining the interfaces of large protein–protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[37]  I. Shimada NMR techniques for identifying the interface of a larger protein-protein complex: cross-saturation and transferred cross-saturation experiments. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[38]  D. Frank Hsu,et al.  Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[39]  B. Meyer,et al.  Group epitope mapping by saturation transfer difference NMR to identify segments of a ligand in direct contact with a protein receptor. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[41]  I. Shimada,et al.  Theoretical analyses of the transferred cross-saturation method. , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[42]  Bernd Meyer,et al.  Characterization of Ligand Binding by Saturation Transfer Difference NMR Spectroscopy. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[43]  R. Clark,et al.  Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[44]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.

[45]  Masaya Orita,et al.  Lead generation and examples opinion regarding how to follow up hits. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[46]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[47]  Y. Fukunishi,et al.  Structure determination of a protein assembly by amino acid selective cross‐saturation , 2011, Proteins.

[48]  Robin Taylor,et al.  A new test set for validating predictions of protein–ligand interaction , 2002, Proteins.

[49]  C. Venkatachalam,et al.  LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[50]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.