Sequencing bilateral robot-assisted arm therapy and constraint-induced therapy improves reach to press and trunk kinematics in patients with stroke

BackgroundThe combination of robot-assisted therapy (RT) and a modified form of constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) shows promise for improving motor function of patients with stroke. However, whether the changes of motor control strategies are concomitant with the improvements in motor function after combination of RT and mCIT (RT + mCIT) is unclear. This study investigated the effects of the sequential combination of RT + mCIT compared with RT alone on the strategies of motor control measured by kinematic analysis and on motor function and daily performance measured by clinical scales.MethodsThe study enrolled 34 patients with chronic stroke. The data were derived from part of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants in the RT + mCIT and RT groups received 20 therapy sessions (90 to 105 min/day, 5 days for 4 weeks). Patients in the RT + mCIT group received 10 RT sessions for first 2 weeks and 10 mCIT sessions for the next 2 weeks. The Bi-Manu-Track was used in RT sessions to provide bilateral practice of wrist and forearm movements. The primary outcome was kinematic variables in a task of reaching to press a desk bell. Secondary outcomes included scores on the Wolf Motor Function Test, Functional Independence Measure, and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living. All outcome measures were administered before and after intervention.ResultsRT + mCIT and RT demonstrated different benefits on motor control strategies. RT + mCIT uniquely improved motor control strategies by reducing shoulder abduction, increasing elbow extension, and decreasing trunk compensatory movement during the reaching task. Motor function and quality of the affected limb was improved, and patients achieved greater independence in instrumental activities of daily living. Force generation at movement initiation was improved in the patients who received RT.ConclusionA combination of RT and mCIT could be an effective approach to improve stroke rehabilitation outcomes, achieving better motor control strategies, motor function, and functional independence of instrumental activities of daily living.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01727648

[1]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Mao‐Hsiung Huang,et al.  Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  B. Wünsche,et al.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Dewald,et al.  Task-dependent weakness at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy combined with conventional neurorehabilitation techniques in chronic stroke patients with plegic hands: a case series. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  F. Nouri,et al.  An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients , 1987 .

[8]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[9]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Movement Kinematics and Daily Function in Patients With Stroke: A Kinematic Study of Motor Control Mechanisms , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  K. Domen,et al.  A 6-month follow-up after constraint-induced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial , 2013, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  B. Indredavik,et al.  A meta-analysis of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Journal of Neurology.

[13]  B. Brewer,et al.  Poststroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of Robotic Systems and Clinical Results , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[14]  Marcus J. Fuhrer,et al.  Rehabilitation outcomes : analysis and measurement , 1987 .

[15]  Responsiveness and validity of two outcome measures of instrumental activities of daily living in stroke survivors receiving rehabilitative therapies , 2011, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice , 2006 .

[17]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Rahsaan J. Holley,et al.  Robotic Therapy Provides a Stimulus for Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke That Is Complementary to and Distinct From Conventional Therapy , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[23]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[24]  K. Laake,et al.  Well-being and instrumental activities of daily living after stroke , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[25]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[28]  Robert C. Wagenaar,et al.  Therapy Impact on Functional Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[29]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Dose-Matched Control Intervention to Improve Motor Ability, Basic/Extended Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[30]  Roland R. Lee,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Dennis A. Nowak,et al.  The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: Usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  E. Taub,et al.  Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  J. André,et al.  Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. , 1994, Disability and rehabilitation.

[34]  B. Hamilton.  A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. , 1987 .

[35]  Bernhard Elsner,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[36]  S. Wolf,et al.  Quality-of-Life Change Associated With Robotic-Assisted Therapy to Improve Hand Motor Function in Patients With Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[37]  Evaluation of stroke patients with the extended activities of daily living scale in Taiwan , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[38]  M. Thaut,et al.  The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  Isabelle Laffont,et al.  The Contribution of Kinematics in the Assessment of Upper Limb Motor Recovery Early After Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[40]  P A Thompson,et al.  The Motor Activity Log-28 , 2006, Neurology.

[41]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robot-Assisted Arm Training in Subacute Stroke Patients , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

[42]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[43]  Eliseo Stefano Maini,et al.  Using Kinematic Analysis to Evaluate Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[44]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[45]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Kinematic Variables Quantifying Upper-Extremity Performance After Stroke During Reaching and Drinking From a Glass , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[46]  Victor W. Mark,et al.  Method for Enhancing Real-World Use of a More Affected Arm in Chronic Stroke: Transfer Package of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy , 2013, Stroke.

[47]  Chang Gung,et al.  Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[48]  G. Yao,et al.  Dose–Response Relationship of Robot-Assisted Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: The Impact of Initial Motor Status , 2012, Stroke.

[49]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[50]  J. Szaflarski,et al.  Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy in Chronic Stroke: Results of a Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[51]  H. Dickson,et al.  Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[52]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[53]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[54]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[55]  M. MacKay-Lyons,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity Recovery Post Stroke : What Is the Evidence ? , 2014 .

[56]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[57]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[59]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  T. Stevenson,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Compared to Dose-Matched Interventions for Upper-Limb Dysfunction in Adult Survivors of Stroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. , 2012, Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada.

[61]  J. Dewald,et al.  Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading is a Crucial Element of Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[62]  Won Hyuk Chang,et al.  Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of stroke.

[63]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[64]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[65]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[66]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[67]  Elisabeth Svensson,et al.  Parallel reliability of the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel ADL index , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[68]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Effect of Therapist-Based Versus Robot-Assisted Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Control, Functional Performance, and Quality of Life After Chronic Stroke: A Clinical Trial , 2012, Physical Therapy.