Depth judgment measures and occluding surfaces in near-field augmented reality

In this paper we describe an apparatus and experiment that measured depth judgments in augmented reality at near-field distances of 34 to 50 centimeters. The experiment compared perceptual matching, a closed-loop task for measuring depth judgments, with blind reaching, a visually open-loop task for measuring depth judgments. The experiment also studied the effect of a highly salient occluding surface appearing behind, coincident with, and in front of a virtual object. The apparatus and closed-loop matching task were based on previous work by Ellis and Menges. The experiment found maximum average depth judgment errors of 5.5 cm, and found that the blind reaching judgments were less accurate than the perceptual matching judgments. The experiment found that the presence of a highly-salient occluding surface has a complicated effect on depth judgments, but does not lead to systematically larger or smaller errors.

[1]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Augmented reality: a new way of seeing. , 2002, Scientific American.

[2]  Eric Kolstad,et al.  Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Ordinal depth information from accommodation? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[4]  R J Miller Nonius alignment apparatus for measuring vergence. , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[6]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Localization of a Time-Delayed, Monocular Virtual Object Superimposed on a Real Environment , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency , 1973 .

[8]  G P Bingham,et al.  Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Miller Rj Nonius alignment apparatus for measuring vergence. , 1987 .

[10]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Method of Adjustments versus Method of Constant Stimuli in the Quantification of Accuracy and Precision of Rendered Depth in Head-Mounted Displays , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[12]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Elucidating Factors that Can Facilitate Veridical Spatial Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[13]  N. Navab,et al.  Advanced Medical Displays: A Literature Review of Augmented Reality , 2008, Journal of Display Technology.

[14]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[17]  Eric Kolstad,et al.  The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[18]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[20]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1979 .

[21]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Localization of Virtual Objects in the Near Visual Field , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[22]  E. Williams Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[23]  Adam L. Janin,et al.  Several devils in the details: making an AR application work in the airplane factory , 1999 .

[24]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception , 1999, Perception.

[25]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret , 2009, 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.