Place Based STEM: Leveraging Local Resources to Engage K-12 Teachers in Teaching Integrated STEM and for Addressing the Local STEM Pipeline

Business, industry, parks, nature settings, government infrastructure, and people, can be invaluable resources for connecting STEM curriculum within context which results in conditions ideal for promoting purposeful learning of authentic STEM content. Thus, community-based STEM resources offer ideal context for teaching STEM content. A benefit of focusing teacher attention on these contextual, content aligned resources is that they are in every community; making place-based STEM education a possibility, regardless of the location of STEM teaching and learning. Further, associating STEM teaching and learning with local resources addresses workforce development and the STEM pipeline by exposing students to STEM careers and applications in their local communities. The desire to align STEM teaching and learning with local STEM related resources guided the design of our week-long integrated STEM K-12 teacher professional development (PD) program, i-STEM. We have completed four years of our i-STEM PD program and have made place-based STEM a major emphasis of our curriculum. This report focuses on the data collected in the fourth year of our program. Our week-long i-STEM PD served over 425 educators last summer (2013), providing them with in depth theme-based integrated STEM short courses which were limited to an average of 15 participants and whole group plenary sessions focused around placedbased integrated STEM, inquiry, engineering design, standards and practices of Common Core and 21 Century skills. This state wide PD was distributed in five Idaho community colleges and took place over two weeks. The STEM short courses included topics on engineering for sustainability, using engineering to spark interest in STEM, municipal water systems, health, agriculture, food safety, mining, forestry, energy, and others. Integral to these short courses were field trips designed to connect the K-12 educators to the resources in their local communities that could be leveraged for teaching integrated STEM and provide a relevant context for teaching STEM content. Workplace presentations made by place-based STEM experts and provided teachers field trips to place-base STEM industries and business such as manufacturing plants, waste water treatment systems, mines, nature parks, food processing plants, research, hospitals, and laboratory facilities. We researched the 425 participants’ conceptions of place-based STEM prior to and after their taking part in the summer institutes, which included fieldtrips. Our findings revealed substantial increase in our participants’ knowledge, interest, and plans to use place-based resources for teaching integrated STEM. We detail the data analysis and provide a theoretical foundation and justification for the importance of place-based STEM to address the STEM pipeline for the future workforce.

[1]  Louis S. Nadelson,et al.  Perceptions, Engagement, and Practices of Teachers Seeking Professional Development in Place-Based Integrated STEM. , 2013 .

[2]  Cheryl Schrader,et al.  A SySTEMic Solution: Elementary Teacher Preparation in STEM Expertise and Engineering Awareness , 2009 .

[3]  M. Monroe,et al.  The effects of environment‐based education on students' critical thinking skills and disposition toward critical thinking , 2004 .

[4]  Student teachers’ confidence to teach science: is more science knowledge necessary to improve self‐confidence? , 1995 .

[5]  David Sobel MEd.  Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities , 2005 .

[6]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy , 1994 .

[7]  D. Ball.  Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation. , 1988 .

[8]  B. Posner,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Leadership Practices Inventory-Updated , 1993 .

[9]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[10]  P. Warwick,et al.  How primary trainee teachers perceive the development of their own scientific knowledge: Links between confidence, content and competence? , 2002 .

[11]  Anne M. Raymond.  Inconsistency between a Beginning Elementary School Teacher's Mathematics Beliefs and Teaching Practice. , 1997 .

[12]  S. Semken,et al.  Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place‐based science teaching , 2008 .

[13]  Gregory A. Smith,et al.  Place-Based Education: Learning to Be Where We are , 2002 .

[14]  M. Miles,et al.  The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .

[15]  Steven Semken,et al.  Sense of Place and Place-Based Introductory Geoscience Teaching for American Indian and Alaska Native Undergraduates , 2005 .

[16]  Ozgul Yilmaz-Tuzun,et al.  Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs About Science Teaching , 2008 .

[17]  Suzanne M. Wilson,et al.  Creating Effective Teachers: Concise Answers for Hard Questions. An Addendum to the Report "Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations.". , 2003 .

[18]  G. A. Lieberman,et al.  Closing the Achievement Gap: Using the Environment as an Integrating Context for Learning. Executive Summary. , 1998 .

[19]  Amy L. Powers.  An Evaluation of Four Place-Based Education Programs , 2004 .

[20]  Jill Casner-Lotto,et al.  Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers' Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century U.S. Workforce. , 2006 .