Are you bored?: Maybe an interface agent can help!

In this paper we present the influence of Emotive Interface Agents on task-induced boredom. We studied the effects of two agents --- friendly and unfriendly. The results show that, like human-human interaction, emotional contagion can happen between agents and users and that it can lead to reduction in task induced boredom. As expected, the friendly agent proved to be more successful in reducing boredom and maintaining participants' focus on task than the unfriendly agent. Moreover, participants felt that the friendly agent added stimulation to the task. This indicates that the friendly agent had some influence on the perception of the task. However, the effects of the unfriendly agent should not be downplayed. Even though the unfriendly agent was perceived as irritating and annoying, a majority of the participants felt that the agent masked the boredom and the monotony of performing a simple repetitive task. More surprisingly many participants found it entertaining to interact with the unfriendly agent, implying counter contagion of emotions. Given the findings of this study, we believe that agents have great potential in regulating emotions. We believe these agents can be successfully used in everyday monotonous/boring tasks such as e-form filling and data entry. With further research we also believe that agents can be extended into learning environments to assist in regulating emotions in learners.

[1]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Persona Effect Revisited --- Using Bio-signals to Measure and Reflect the Impact of Character-bas , 2003 .

[2]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Evaluating Users' Experience of a Character-enhanced Information Space , 2000, AI Commun..

[3]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Interacting with an embodied emotional character , 2003, DPPI '03.

[4]  Kate S. Hone,et al.  Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[5]  C. Breazeal Sociable Machines: Expressive Social Ex-change Between Humans and Robots , 2000 .

[6]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[8]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  H. Leventhal,et al.  A Perceptual-Motor Processing Model of Emotion , 1979 .

[10]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  J. Turner Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Lewis,et al.  The effects of animated character in multimedia presentation: attention and comprehension , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[13]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  eMuu : an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home , 2002 .

[14]  Kevin Larson,et al.  The Aesthetics of Reading , 2005 .

[15]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  NassClifford,et al.  Computers that care , 2005 .

[17]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  The effects of affective interventions in human-computer interaction , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[18]  Rosalind W. Picard Affective Computing , 1997 .

[19]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[20]  V. Surakka,et al.  Auditory Emotional Feedback Facilitates Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[21]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[22]  G. Bower Affect and Cognition , 1983, A Configuration Approach to Mindset Agency Theory.

[23]  Kristina Höök,et al.  eMoto: affectively involving both body and mind , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.