Visible Angle on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Be Considered Indicator of Postoperative Outcome in Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

Received March 9, 2017, Revised April 1, 2017, Accepted April 6, 2017 Corresponding Author: Tae-Hwan Kim Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 680 Gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 41944, Korea E-mail: doctork@knu.ac.kr Tel: +82-53-200-2166, Fax: +82-53-421-9618 Visible Angle on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Be Considered Indicator of Postoperative Outcome in Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

[1]  M. Menon,et al.  Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. , 2015, European urology.

[2]  Jim C Hu,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. , 2014, European urology.

[3]  H. Seo,et al.  Pelvic floor musculature and bladder neck changes before and after continence recovery after radical prostatectomy in pelvic MRI , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  T. Masterson,et al.  Advances in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy over Time , 2013, Prostate cancer.

[6]  Jim C Hu,et al.  Does Robotic Prostatectomy Meet Its Promise in the Management of Prostate Cancer? , 2013, Current Urology Reports.

[7]  S. Moon,et al.  Preoperative Factors Predictive of Continence Recovery after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy , 2012, Korean journal of urology.

[8]  Wendy Chaboyer,et al.  Factors that influence the expected length of operation: results of a prospective study , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[9]  D. Albala,et al.  Surgical steps that elongate operative time in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the obese population. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[10]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Scardino,et al.  The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy , 2010, BJU international.

[12]  V. Ficarra,et al.  A prospective, non‐randomized trial comparing robot‐assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution , 2009, BJU international.

[13]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[14]  G. Lockwood,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of the ‘hostile pelvis’ in radical prostatectomy with computed tomographic pelvimetry , 2007, BJU international.

[15]  Eric L Eisenstein,et al.  Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[16]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[17]  Kathryn E. McGoldrick,et al.  Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States , 2004 .

[18]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.