The 100,000 lives campaign: setting a goal and a deadline for improving health care quality.

AHALF DECADE HAS ELAPSED SINCE THE INSTITUTE OF Medicine released2 landmarkreportsonhealthcare safety and quality, To Err Is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm. Those studies helped articulate a broad agenda for quality improvement in health care, and examples of success on a small scale are numerous. However, the collective impact of improvement work has been far below the potential envisioned by the Institute of Medicine. Health care can benefit now from a new sense of urgency, with levels of discipline and pace akin to those of a political campaign. Political campaigns cannot afford patience. Political campaign professionals often cite the rule: “Some is not a number; soon is not a time.” A campaign works with a firm target: 50% plus one: the number of votes needed to win— one less is not enough—and a firm deadline: election day. To quicken the pace of quality improvement in health care, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) in December 2004 launched the 100 000 Lives Campaign—a national initiative with a goal of saving 100 000 lives among patients in hospitals through improvements in the safety and effectiveness of health care. For operational purposes in the campaign, a “life saved” is defined as a patient successfully discharged from a hospital who, absent the changes achieved during the campaign, would not have survived. Arbitrarily, IHI set a deadline of June 14, 2006, for achieving that goal, precisely 18 months after the announcement of the campaign at the IHI’s 16th Annual National Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care. All of the nation’s 5759 hospitals have been invited to join through a simple enrollment process, explained on the IHI Web site (available at http://www.ihi.org), and they have been requested to acknowledge publicly their involvement, regularly sharing their progress in reducing mortality. How can US hospitals possibly save 100 000 lives by June 14, 2006? The campaign proposes that US hospitals implement as many as possible of 6 highly feasible interventions for which efficacy is documented in the peer-reviewed literature and is reflected in standards set by relevant specialty societies and government agencies. Campaign Interventions

[1]  E. Septimus 100K Lives Campaign , 2005 .

[2]  K. Hillman,et al.  Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[3]  Roger Resar,et al.  Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[4]  P Gastmeier,et al.  [Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia]. , 2005, Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS.

[5]  Claudio Sandroni,et al.  In-hospital cardiac arrest: survival depends mainly on the effectiveness of the emergency response. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[6]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Devita,et al.  Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Acip Prevention and control of influenza : recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) , 2004 .

[9]  Rinaldo Bellomo,et al.  The Medical Journal of Australia ISSN: , 2000 .

[10]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority Areas for National Action , 2003 .

[11]  G. Moore,et al.  Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  K. McDonald,et al.  Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. , 2001, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[13]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  M Schetz,et al.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Resar,et al.  Medication Safety: One Organization's Approach to the Challenge , 2001 .

[16]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[17]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[18]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[19]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[20]  A. Kurz,et al.  Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.