Applying Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Adolescent Sexual Offenders

Attentional bias toward child images is assessed among adolescent sexual offenders and nonsexual offenders using the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) method, which measures the effects of “attentional blink.” Twenty adolescent sexual offenders against children and 26 nonsexual offenders are asked to identify a child or animal image and then a second image in streams of 10 images. A stronger attentional blink effect is expected for offenders against children after viewing child rather than animal images. However, the expected differences between offender groups are not found. It is questioned whether the RSVP images can elicit a response in adolescent sexual offenders indicative of DSI. The clinical utility of applying the RSVP assessment with adolescents rather than adults is also queried because (a) adolescents' cognitive abilities may not allow them to conceptualize and concentrate on the assessment in its present form and (b) deviant sexual interest may be evident to different degrees in adolescent sexual offenders.

[1]  S. Rosenzweig THE PHOTOSCOPE AS AN OBJECTIVE DEVICE FOR EVALUATING SEXUAL INTEREST* , 1942 .

[2]  Armand J. Quick,et al.  THE QUICK TEST , 1951 .

[3]  I. B. Pless,et al.  A RAPID SCREENING TEST FOR INTELLIGENCE IN CHILDREN: A PRELIMINARY REPORT. , 1965, American journal of diseases of children.

[4]  F. H. Mcclintock,et al.  Crime in England and Wales , 1969 .

[5]  J. Cull,et al.  Correlation between the Quick Test (Qt) and the Wais Verbal Scale in the Rehabilitation Setting , 1970, Psychological reports.

[6]  Jean Piaget Piaget’s Theory , 1976 .

[7]  Charles L. Nicholson,et al.  Correlations between the Quick Test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised , 1977, Psychological reports.

[8]  B. Singer Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction , 1984 .

[9]  J. V. Becker,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Audio-Taped Phallometric Stimuli With Adolescent Sexual Offenders , 1992 .

[10]  Dennis A. Romig,et al.  The Balanced Approach to Juvenile Probation , 1988 .

[11]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. E. Adams,et al.  Assessment of sexual preference using a choice reaction time task , 1994 .

[13]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[14]  J. Hunter,et al.  Ethical and Legal Issues in the Assessment and Treatment of Juvenile Sex Offenders , 1998 .

[15]  Lane Fischer,et al.  Assessment of Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Reliability and Validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias , 1999, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[16]  L. Fischer,et al.  Assessment of Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Reliability and Validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias , 1999, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[17]  Psychometric Analysis of the Sexual Interest Cardsort Questionnaire , 2000, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[18]  M. Seto,et al.  The discriminative validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interests among adolescent sex offenders against children. , 2000, Psychological assessment.

[19]  D. R. Laws,et al.  Classification of Child Molesters by Plethysmographic Assessment of Sexual Arousal and a Self-Report Measure of Sexual Preference , 2000 .

[20]  G. Schmidt The Dilemma of the Male Pedophile , 2002, Archives of sexual behavior.

[21]  R. Green Is Pedophilia a Mental Disorder? , 2002, Archives of sexual behavior.

[22]  M. Conroy Assessment of Sexual Offenders , 2002 .

[23]  M. Seto,et al.  Detecting Anomalous Sexual Interests in Juvenile Sex Offenders , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Phil Rich Understanding, Assessing, and Rehabilitating Juvenile Sexual Offenders , 2003 .

[25]  Use of Visual Reaction Time to Assess Male Adolescents Who Molest Children , 2004, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[26]  S. Araji Preadolescents and adolescents : Evaluating normative and non-normative sexual behaviours and development , 2004 .

[27]  Paul Smith,et al.  Processing Bias for Sexual Material: The Emotional Stroop and Sexual Offenders , 2004, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[28]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review , 2005 .

[29]  Shelley A. Price,et al.  A modified Stroop task with sexual offenders: Replication of a study , 2005 .

[30]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Anxiety and the deployment of visual attention over time , 2005 .

[31]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Insights into the control of attentional set in ADHD using the attentional blink paradigm. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[32]  David E. Bard,et al.  Risk Factors for Adolescent Sex Offender Recidivism: Evaluation of Predictive Factors and Comparison of Three Groups Based Upon Victim Type , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[33]  J. Worling Assessing Sexual Arousal with Adolescent Males Who Have Offended Sexually: Self-Report and Unobtrusively Measured Viewing Time , 2006, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[34]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  Beyond Task 1 difficulty: The duration of T1 encoding modulates the attentional blink , 2007 .

[35]  S. Tipper,et al.  Children induce an enhanced attentional blink in child molesters. , 2008, Psychological assessment.

[36]  A. Boisjoli Boys Who Have Abused: Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy with Victim / Perpetrators of Sexual Abuse. , 2010 .