Multi-objective performance assessment of wastewater treatment plants combining plant-wide process models and life cycle assessment

Multi-objective performance assessment of operational strategies at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is a challenging task. The holistic perspective applied to evaluation of modern WWTPs, including not only effluent quality but also resource efficiency and recovery, global environmental impact and operational cost calls for assessment methods including both on- and off-site effects. In this study, a method combining dynamic process models – including greenhouse gas (GHG), detailed energy models and operational cost – and life cycle assessment (LCA) was developed. The method was applied and calibrated to a large Swedish WWTP. In a performance assessment study, changing the operational strategy to chemically enhanced primary treatment was evaluated. The results show that the primary objectives, to enhance bio-methane production and reduce GHG emissions were reached. Bio-methane production increased by 14% and the global warming potential decreased by 28%. However, due to increased consumption of chemicals, the operational cost increased by 87% and the LCA revealed that the abiotic depletion of elements and fossil resources increased by 77 and 305%, respectively. The results emphasize the importance of using plant-wide mechanistic models and life cycle analysis to capture both the dynamics of the plant and the potential environmental impacts.

[1]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[2]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Joint Environmental and Economical Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plants Control Strategies: A Benchmark Scenario Analysis , 2016 .

[3]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Calibration and validation of an activated sludge model for greenhouse gases no. 1 (ASMG1): prediction of temperature-dependent N2O emission dynamics , 2014, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[4]  Juan Trillo,et al.  Comentarios al IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 22: ´Guidelines for using activated sludge models´ , 2014 .

[5]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[6]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Modelling nitrous and nitric oxide emissions by autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria , 2013, Environmental technology.

[7]  Mats Almemark,et al.  Environmental performance of wastewater reuse systems: impact of system boundaries and external conditions. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Modelling and characterization of primary settlers in view of whole plant and resource recovery modelling. , 2015, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  S. Morera,et al.  Assessing Urban Wastewater System Upgrades Using Integrated Modeling, Life Cycle Analysis, and Shadow Pricing. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Magnus Arnell.  Implementation of the Bürger-Diehl settler model on the benchmark simulation platform , 2015 .

[11]  Gustaf Olsson,et al.  Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities , 2012 .

[12]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2014 .

[13]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  A consistent modelling methodology for secondary settling tanks: a reliable numerical method. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[15]  A B Bisinella de Faria,et al.  Evaluation of new alternatives in wastewater treatment plants based on dynamic modelling and life cycle assessment (DM-LCA). , 2015, Water research.

[16]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Modelling anaerobic co-digestion in Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2: Parameter estimation, substrate characterisation and plant-wide integration. , 2016, Water research.

[17]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including Life Cycle Assessment for decision-making in controlling wastewater nutrient removal systems. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Ll Corominas,et al.  Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art. , 2013, Water research.

[19]  Miljøvurdering af genanvendelse og slutdisponering af spildevandsslam: en livscyklus screening af fire scenarier , 2005 .

[20]  J. Zotti,et al.  Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy: Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility , 2016 .

[21]  P-A Malmqvist,et al.  Strategic planning of sustainable urban water management , 2015 .

[22]  I. Takács.  A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[23]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Recent advances in mathematical modeling of nitrous oxides emissions from wastewater treatment processes. , 2015, Water research.

[24]  U. Jeppsson,et al.  Dynamic modelling of nitrous oxide emissions from three Swedish sludge liquor treatment systems. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[27]  R. Otterpohl,et al.  Dynamic Models for Clarifiers of Activated Sludge Plants with Dry and Wet Weather Flows , 1992 .

[28]  M. Svanström,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sludge management with phosphorus utilisation and improved hygienisation in Sweden. , 2017, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Peter Weiland,et al.  Methane emissions from biogas‐producing facilities within the agricultural sector , 2010 .

[31]  Hallvard Ødegaard,et al.  Optimised particle separation in the primary step of wastewater treatment , 1998 .

[32]  Håkan Jönsson,et al.  Minska utsläpp av växthusgaser från rening av avlopp och hantering av avloppsslam , 2015 .

[33]  Günter Langergraber,et al.  Guidelines for Using Activated Sludge Models , 2012 .

[34]  S. Ogle,et al.  N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application , 2019 .

[35]  G. Olsson,et al.  Greenhouse gases from wastewater treatment - A review of modelling tools. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Magnus Arnell,et al.  Performance Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plants: Multi-Objective Analysis Using Plant-Wide Models , 2016 .

[37]  Lluís Corominas,et al.  Life cycle assessment of construction and renovation of sewer systems using a detailed inventory tool , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[38]  C. Grady,et al.  An Updated Process Model for Carbon Oxidation, Nitrification, and Denitrification , 2008, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[39]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Aeration system modelling - case studies from three full-scale wastewater treatment plants , 2015 .