Patient preferences for future care - how can Advance Care Planning become embedded into dementia care: a study protocol

BackgroundPeople living with a long term condition may wish to be able to plan ahead, so that if in future they cannot make decisions, their wishes about their care will be known; this process is termed Advance Care Planning (ACP). In dementia, guidance stipulates that ACP discussions should take place whilst the person still has capacity to make decisions. However there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of ACP in influencing patient choice and resource use. The aims of this study are to determine the effectiveness of ACP in dementia care, identify the factors which facilitate the process in practice and provide a better understanding of the views and experiences of key stakeholders in order to inform clinical practice.Methods/DesignThe four phase project comprises a systematic review (Phase 1) and a series of qualitative studies (Phases 2 and 3), with data collection via focus groups and individual interviews with relevant stakeholders including people with dementia and their carers, health and social care professionals and representatives from voluntary organisations and the legal profession. The conduct of the systematic review will follow current best practice guidance. In phases 2 and 3, focus groups will be employed to seek the perspectives of the professionals; individual interviews will be carried out with people with dementia and their carers. Data from Phases 1, 2 and 3 will be synthesised in a series of team workshops to develop draft guidance and educational tools for implementing ACP in practice (Phase 4).DiscussionIn the UK, there is little published research on the effectiveness of ACP, despite its introduction into policy. This study was designed to explore in greater depth how ACP can best be carried out in routine practice. It affords the opportunity to develop both a theoretical and practical understanding of an area which both patients and professionals may find emotionally challenging. Importantly the study will also develop practical tools, which are grounded in practice, for all relevant stakeholders to enable the facilitation of timely and sensitive ACP discussions.

[1]  Stella Chan,et al.  Advance care planning and hospital in the nursing home. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[2]  Marion Danis,et al.  Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  R. Adelman,et al.  Completing an Advance Directive in the Primary Care Setting: What Do We Need for Success? , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  I. Higginson,et al.  Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. , 2000, Journal of palliative medicine.

[5]  Housing Lin Dementia - supporting people with dementia and their carers in health & social care , 2006 .

[6]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life A Systematic Review , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  A. Harden,et al.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[8]  D. Clark,et al.  Older people's views about home as a place of care at the end of life , 2004, Palliative medicine.

[9]  E. Tacconelli Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[10]  Marie-France Dubois,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: a systematic review and multi-level analysis. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[11]  John Young,et al.  National Service Framework for Older People , 2002 .

[12]  R. Haynes,et al.  Search Strategies for Identifying Qualitative Studies in CINAHL , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[13]  L. Robinson,et al.  Care Planning : An opportunity for person-centred care for people living with dementia , 2009 .

[14]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Version 1 , 2006 .

[15]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups , 2006 .

[17]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  The Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[18]  J. Addington-hall,et al.  THE EXPERIENCE OF DYING WITH DEMENTIA: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY , 1997, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[20]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports , 2007 .

[21]  B. Glaser The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[22]  P. S. Lorda,et al.  Interventions for promoting the use of advance directives for end-of-life decisions in adults (protocol) , 2008 .

[23]  K. Froggatt,et al.  Advance care planning in care homes for older people: an English perspective , 2009, Palliative medicine.

[24]  J. García-Gutiérrez,et al.  Interventions for promoting the use of advance directives for end‐of‐life decisions in adults , 2012 .

[25]  L. Robinson,et al.  End-of-life care and dementia , 2005 .

[26]  C. Pope,et al.  Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[27]  Mary Ann Meeker,et al.  The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Advance Directive Completion Rates , 2007, Journal of aging and health.

[28]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[29]  David R. Jones,et al.  Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.