Wait, focus and spray: efficient data delivery in wireless sensor networks with ubiquitous mobile data collectors

With decrease in the cost and the size of sensor devices, we can envision a world of ubiquitous sensor networks. Usually, sensor data needs to be disseminated from the source to data collectors, making the spatially distributed sensor data available for applications. The widespread and ubiquitous nature of mobile devices, e.g., PDAs and cell phones around the world, makes them attractive to be used as mobile data collectors (MDCs) to collect and deliver the sensor data. The goal of this work is to design a dissemination protocol that leads to efficient data delivery from the source sensors to ubiquitous MDCs. We propose the Wait-Focus-Spray (WFS) data delivery scheme for wireless sensor networks with ubiquitous MDCs. The main objective of WFS is to balance the data delivery latency and transmission overhead when considering the existence of ubiquitous MDCs. In WFS, we also propose a corresponding mechanism-probabilistic scattered binary spraying (PSBS), to reduce the spatial redundancy when spraying data copies, which can increase the probability of meeting a MDC. We then present an analytical model based on the Markov chain model to analyze the trade-off between delivery latency and transmission cost in WFS. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that our proposed scheme reduces the transmission cost per message while provides comparable delivery delay compared with the alternative approach.

[1]  Ger Koole,et al.  The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, Perform. Evaluation.

[2]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Gossip-based ad hoc routing , 2002, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[3]  Margaret Martonosi,et al.  Hardware design experiences in ZebraNet , 2004, SenSys '04.

[4]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks , 2005, WDTN '05.

[5]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks , 2003, MOCO.

[6]  Sotiris E. Nikoletseas,et al.  Scalable Data Collection Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks with Multiple Mobile Sinks , 2007, 40th Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS'07).

[7]  T. Spyropoulos,et al.  Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Multiple-Copy Case , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[8]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[9]  Dirk Trossen,et al.  Building a ubiquitous platform for remote sensing using smartphones , 2005, The Second Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services.

[10]  Jie Wu,et al.  An optimal probabilistic forwarding protocolin delay tolerant networks , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[11]  Mihaela Cardei,et al.  Improving network lifetime with mobile wireless sensor networks , 2010, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Yang Zhang,et al.  CarTel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system , 2006, SenSys '06.

[13]  Paolo Santi,et al.  The Node Distribution of the Random Waypoint Mobility Model for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[14]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Performance modeling of epidemic routing , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Jian Ma,et al.  A Group-Level Incentive Scheme for Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, 2009 6th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[16]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and Focus: Efficient Mobility-Assisted Routing for Heterogeneous and Correlated Mobility , 2007, Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW'07).

[17]  J. van Loon Network , 2006 .

[18]  Kay Römer,et al.  The design space of wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[19]  Christine Julien,et al.  Scenes: Abstracting interaction in immersive sensor networks , 2007, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[20]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Exploiting Mobility for Energy Efficient Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[21]  Vladimir Dyo Middleware design for integration of sensor network and mobile devices , 2005, DSM '05.

[22]  Jian Ma,et al.  The hybrid mobile wireless sensor networks for data gathering , 2006, IWCMC '06.

[23]  Prem Prakash Jayaraman,et al.  Sensor Data Collection Using Heterogeneous Mobile Devices , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services.

[24]  Pedro M. Ruiz,et al.  BOSS: Beacon-less On Demand Strategy for Geographic Routing inWireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[25]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[26]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[27]  Srikanta Tirthapura,et al.  Delay, cost and infrastructure tradeoff of epidemic routing in mobile sensor networks , 2010, IWCMC.

[28]  Öznur Özkasap,et al.  Ad-Hoc Networks , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[29]  Ahmed E. Kamal,et al.  Modeling Mobility-Assisted Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[30]  Rajesh Krishnan,et al.  Towards a formalism for routing in challenged networks , 2007, CHANTS '07.

[31]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Mobility-based communication in wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[32]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  The sensor internet at work: Locating everyday items using mobile phones , 2008, Pervasive Mob. Comput..