Integrating Risk Assessment into Spatial Planning: RiskOTe Decision Support System

The way in which risk maps are used in decision support processes for spatial planning at local scale is critical to helping decision makers in the definition of a prevention strategy to minimize risks. This paper presents a spatial decision support system that is developed to assist spatial planning by integrating the risk management component at municipal level. For the development of the RiskOTe tool, a semi-quantitative risk assessment model was used that assumes risk management to be comprehensive with respect to the type of hazard, vulnerability and risk minimization measures. In this paper, the components for the development of the spatial decision support system are identified, described and implemented using the municipality of Oeiras, in Portugal, as case study. The use of the system allowed the generation of multiple scenarios and outcomes. The results demonstrate that decision-making on the transformation of land uses by integrating risk analysis can be supported on a solid basis of information obtained from a spatial decision support system.

[1]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  Managing the Response to Disasters Using Microcomputers , 1984 .

[2]  E. Jenelius Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis , 2010 .

[3]  P. Schmidt-Thomé Integration of natural hazards, risk, and climate change into spatial planning practices , 2006, Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences.

[4]  Aaron C. Zecchin,et al.  Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: Current status and future research directions , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Ramanathan Sugumaran,et al.  Spatial Decision Support Systems: Principles and Practices , 2010 .

[6]  J. Ribeiro,et al.  Guia metodológico para a produção de cartografia municipal de risco e para a criação de sistemas de informação geográfica (SIG) de base municipal , 2009 .

[7]  A. Müller,et al.  Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach – a case study for Santiago de Chile , 2011 .

[8]  S. Greiving,et al.  Management of natural hazards in Europe: The role of spatial planning in selected EU member states , 2006 .

[9]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[10]  C. Westen,et al.  Multi-hazard risk assessment : Distance education course : Exercise book , 2011 .

[11]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  A MACROSEISMIC METHOD FOR THE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[12]  A. Eissa Spatial decision support system for infrastructure resource allocation , 2013 .

[13]  Jing Ran,et al.  Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[14]  Jeffrey P. Newman,et al.  ON DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMISING LONG-TERM NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION POLICY AND PROJECT PORTFOLIOS , 2014 .

[15]  S. Menoni,et al.  Harmonised hazard , vulnerability and risk assessment methods informing mitigation strategies addressing land-use planning and management , 2006 .

[16]  W. Wallace,et al.  Decision Support Systems for Disaster Management , 1985 .

[17]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  An investigation of system design considerations for emergency management decision support , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  J. Heitgerd,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management , 2011 .

[19]  M. Cioca,et al.  Decision Support Systems used in Disaster Management , 2010 .

[20]  Juan Carlos,et al.  Vulnerability: a conceptional and methodological review , 2006 .

[21]  J. Neuvel Geographical dimensions of risk management: the contribution of spatial planning and Geo-ICT to risk reduction. , 2009 .

[22]  E. A. Castellanos Abella,et al.  Multi-scale landslide risk assessment in Cuba , 2008 .