A method to evaluate the perceived ease of use of human-machine interface in agricultural tractors equipped with Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

At the end of the 20 th century the adoption of the Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) was one of the disruptive technological advances in agricultural tractors. Several changes in the Human Machine Interface (HMI) of the tractor cab have been introduced to accommodate this technology. HMIs are known to raise issues about their ease of use; however, this topic has been under-investigated in the agricultural sector. The present study introduces a method to investigate the perceived ease of use of the HMI of agricultural tractors equipped with technological innovations. The HMI required to manage a CVT tractor was evaluated by sixteen tractor drivers (8 novices and 8 experts). During the first contact with the machine and after having performed two targeted tasks with the tractor, participants filled in a questionnaire about the ease of use of the controls and of the touch-screen display, and evaluated the general perception of ease of use, safety, quality and solidity of the machine. The trial pointed out some significant differences between novices and experts, thus confirming the validity of the proposed method. In particular, novice users showed some difficulties when interacting for the first time with the HMI of the CVT tractor working station, whereas experts did not report similar difficulties. Thus, expertise seems to play a role in determining the quality of the interaction with the HMI. Training interventions should be designed to help novices in increasing their expertise effectively, avoiding effort and errors and improving user’s comfort and system performance.

[1]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[2]  R H Rautiainen,et al.  A systematic review of farm safety interventions. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  F. A. Fathallah,et al.  Ability of youth operators to reach farm tractor controls , 2009, Ergonomics.

[4]  Eugenio Cavallo,et al.  Safety signs on agricultural machinery: Pictorials do not always successfully convey their messages to target users. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design , 1986 .

[7]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing web usability , 1999 .

[8]  Hiller A. Spires,et al.  Prior knowledge activation: Inducing engagement with informational texts. , 1998 .

[9]  R. Weber Basic content analysis, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[10]  J. Arnó,et al.  Review. Precision Viticulture. Research topics, challenges and opportunities in site-specific vineyard management , 2009 .

[11]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Scenarios in discount usability engineering , 1995 .

[12]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Mario Coccia,et al.  Likely Technological Trajectories in Agricultural Tractors by Analysing Innovative Attitudes of Farmers , 2015 .

[14]  Eugenio Cavallo,et al.  Comprehension of safety pictograms affixed to agricultural machinery: A survey of users. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Torben Bach Pedersen,et al.  Flexible exchange of farming device data , 2011 .

[16]  Mario Coccia,et al.  Strategic management implications for the adoption of technological innovations in agricultural tractor: the role of scale factors and environmental attitude , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  C. Amiama-Ares,et al.  Manual GPS guidance system for agricultural vehicles , 2011 .

[18]  E Ferrari,et al.  Operators' perception of comfort in two tractor cabs. , 2013, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[19]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[20]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  IT—Information Technology and the Human Interface: Tractor Vibration Severity and Driver Health: a Study from Rural India , 2001 .

[21]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[22]  M. Coccia,et al.  Attitudes and Behaviour of Adopters of Technological Innovations in Agricultural Tractors: A Case Study in Italian Agricultural System , 2014 .

[23]  Younho Seong,et al.  Evaluation of human–agent user interfaces in multi-agent systems , 2009 .

[24]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[25]  Friedhelm Nachreiner,et al.  Human factors in process control systems: The design of human–machine interfaces ☆ , 2006 .

[26]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  Rajvir Yadav,et al.  Tractor operator workplace design-a review , 1998 .

[28]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Kristin Smith-Crowe,et al.  Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[30]  W E Field,et al.  Utilizing expert panels in agricultural safety and health research. , 2005, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[31]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[32]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[33]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Johannes A.G.M. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. , 2000 .

[35]  Eugenio Cavallo,et al.  Machinery-Related Perceived Risks and Safety Attitudes in Senior Swedish Farmers , 2017, Journal of agromedicine.

[36]  Jürgen Sauer,et al.  The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[37]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[38]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[39]  C. E. Rash,et al.  THE HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE CHALLENGE , 2009 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..