Flexor tendon repair with a knotless, bidirectional barbed suture: an in vivo biomechanical analysis.

PURPOSE To compare and analyze biomechanical properties and histological characteristics of flexor tendons either repaired by a 4-strand modified Kessler technique or using barbed suture with a knotless repair technique in an in vivo model. METHODS A total of 25 chickens underwent surgical transection of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon followed by either a 4-strand Kessler repair or a knotless repair with barbed suture. Chickens were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups with various postoperative times to death. Harvested tendons were subjected to biomechanical testing or histologic analysis. RESULTS Harvested tendons revealed failures in 25% of knotless repairs (8 of 32) and 8% of 4-strand Kessler repairs (2 of 24). Biomechanical testing revealed no significant difference in tensile strength between 4-strand Kessler and barbed repairs; however, this lack of difference may be attributed to lower statistical power. We noted a trend toward a gradual decrease in strength over time for barbed repairs, whereas we noticed the opposite for the 4-strand Kessler repairs. Mode of failure during testing differed between repair types. The barbed repairs tended toward suture breakage as opposed to 4-strand Kessler repairs, which demonstrated suture pullout. Histological analysis identified no difference in the degree of inflammation or fibrosis; however, there was a vigorous foreign body reaction around the 4-strand Kessler repair and no such response around the barbed repairs. CONCLUSIONS In this model, knotless barbed repairs trended toward higher in vivo failure rates and biomechanical inferiority under physiologic conditions, with each repair technique differing in mode of failure and respective histologic reaction. We are unable to recommend the use of knotless barbed repair over the 4-strand modified Kessler technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE For the repair techniques tested, surgeons should prefer standard Kessler repairs over the described knotless technique with barbed suture.

[1]  S. Warden,et al.  Flexor tendon repair with a knotless barbed suture: a comparative biomechanical study. , 2011, The Journal of hand surgery.

[2]  J. Owen,et al.  Characterization of the tensile properties and histologic/biochemical changes in normal chicken tendon at the site of suture insertion. , 2002, The Journal of hand surgery.

[3]  P. Khaw,et al.  Decrease in adhesion formation by a single application of 5-fluorouracil after flexor tendon injury. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  M. Aoki,et al.  Biomechanical and histologic characteristics of canine flexor tendon repair using early postoperative mobilization. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  M. Aoki,et al.  Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. , 1996, The Journal of hand surgery.

[6]  D. Ruch,et al.  A Knotless Flexor Tendon Repair Technique Using a Bidirectional Barbed Suture: An Ex Vivo Comparison of Three Methods , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  J. W. Strickland.  Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. , 2000, The Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  M. Feldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a Novel Technique for Wound Closure Using a Barbed Suture , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  W. Khan,et al.  An Overview of the Management of Flexor Tendon Injuries , 2012, The open orthopaedics journal.

[10]  K. Walgenbach,et al.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures. , 2014, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[11]  A. R. McKenzie.  An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Bidirectional Barbed Suture: An Evaluation of Safety and Clinical Outcomes , 2010, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[13]  K. An,et al.  The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  S. Woo,et al.  Autogenous flexor tendon grafts: Biologic mechanisms for incorporation , 1997 .

[15]  W. Walsh,et al.  Adhesion formation after flexor tendon repair: a histologic and biomechanical comparison of 2- and 4-strand repairs in a chicken model. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  R. Meffert,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. , 2011, The Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  S. Davison,et al.  Barbed Suture Tenorrhaphy: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Analysis , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  Comparison of Postoperative Early Active Mobilization and Immobilization in Vivo Utilising a Four-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair , 2001, Journal of hand surgery.