Increasing efficiency of photovoltaic systems under non-homogeneous solar irradiation using improved Dynamic Programming methods

Abstract The paper presents a complete technique, based on the combination of algorithms, devoted to minimize losses and increase efficiency of Total Cross Tied (TCT) connected photovoltaic (PV) systems under non-homogeneous solar irradiation, based on irradiance equalization criterion. Irradiance equalization is achieved by changing the connections of the solar panels adaptively by a dynamic switching matrix so that total solar radiation on parallel circuits is the most equalized. In this paper, the authors introduce two algorithms. The first one is SmartChoice (SC) algorithm, which is combined with Dynamic Programming (DP) in order to create a hybrid method and obtain better results as compared to established methods for irradiance equalization. The second one is the control algorithm improvement method from Munkres' Assignment Algorithm (MAA) that helps to increase processing speed and lengthen the lifetime of the solar power system by 56% compared with the older MAA. By emulating and experiencing the operation of the PV system under non-homogeneous irradiation condition, obtained results show efficiency and benefits of the proposed method applied to the solar power system operation while lengthening the lifetime of the switching matrix.

[1]  Hossein Iman-Eini,et al.  A new maximum power point tracking strategy for PV arrays under uniform and non-uniform insolation conditions , 2013 .

[2]  F. Guinjoan,et al.  Irradiance equalization method for output power optimization in plant oriented grid-connected PV generators , 2005, 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications.

[3]  Takashi Oozeki,et al.  PV System With Reconnection to Improve Output Under Nonuniform Illumination , 2012, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[4]  C. Larbes,et al.  Modeling, analysis and comparison of solar photovoltaic array configurations under partial shading conditions , 2015 .

[5]  M. M. A. Salama,et al.  Optimal Photovoltaic Array Reconfiguration to Reduce Partial Shading Losses , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[6]  Chris Deline,et al.  A simplified model of uniform shading in large photovoltaic arrays , 2013 .

[7]  Eleonora Riva Sanseverino,et al.  Reconfigurable electrical interconnection strategies for photovoltaic arrays: A review , 2014 .

[8]  Yi-Hua Liu,et al.  A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic generation systems operating under fast changing environments , 2015 .

[9]  Guillermo Velasco-Quesada,et al.  Electrical PV Array Reconfiguration Strategy for Energy Extraction Improvement in Grid-Connected PV Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  T. Senjyu,et al.  Voltage-based maximum power point tracking control of PV system , 2002 .

[11]  Luigi Costanzo,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking techniques , 2016 .

[12]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Novel current sensing photovoltaic maximum power point tracking based on sliding mode control strategy , 2015 .

[13]  C. A. R. Hoare,et al.  Algorithm 64: Quicksort , 1961, Commun. ACM.

[14]  Ciro Spataro,et al.  PV reconfiguration systems: A technical and economic study , 2017 .

[15]  E. Telaretti,et al.  An analysis of feed’in tariffs for solar PV in six representative countries of the European Union , 2014 .

[16]  Yi-Hua Liu,et al.  Global maximum power point tracking algorithm for PV systems operating under partially shaded conditions using the segmentation search method , 2014 .

[17]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Power Electronics and Control Techniques for Maximum Energy Harvesting in Photovoltaic Systems , 2012 .

[18]  P. R. Wilson,et al.  Improved Optimization Strategy for Irradiance Equalization in Dynamic Photovoltaic Arrays , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[19]  Brad Lehman,et al.  An Adaptive Solar Photovoltaic Array Using Model-Based Reconfiguration Algorithm , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Rosario Miceli,et al.  Technical and Economical Evaluation on the Use of Reconfiguration Systems in Some EU Countries for PV Plants , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[21]  Eric W. Weisstein.  Subset Sum Problem , 2000 .

[22]  Paul A. Lynn,et al.  Electricity from Sunlight: An Introduction to Photovoltaics , 2010 .

[23]  Fabio Viola,et al.  Dynamic programming and Munkres algorithm for optimal photovoltaic arrays reconfiguration , 2015 .

[24]  Gaetano Zizzo,et al.  Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and Wind systems: Four representative European cases , 2009 .

[25]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Partial shadowing of photovoltaic arrays with different system configurations: literature review and field test results , 2003 .

[26]  Wei Liu,et al.  A novel maximum power point tracking strategy based on optimal voltage control for photovoltaic systems under variable environmental conditions , 2015 .

[27]  Rosario Miceli,et al.  Economic benefits of the use of a PV plants reconfiguration systems , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA).

[28]  Rosario Miceli,et al.  An economic study about the installation of PV plants reconfiguration systems in Italy , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA).

[29]  Mahmoud Alahmad,et al.  An adaptive utility interactive photovoltaic system based on a flexible switch matrix to optimize performance in real-time , 2012 .

[30]  Eleonora Riva Sanseverino,et al.  Optimization of photovoltaic energy production through an efficient switching matrix , 2013 .

[31]  B. Raison,et al.  Changing photovoltaic array interconnections to reduce mismatch losses: a case study , 2010, 2010 9th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering.