The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime

The use of ultra-sensitive low copy number (LCN) DNA typing allows the analysis of picogram amounts of DNA. Trace evidence accidentally left at a scene of crime (SOC) by the investigating team may be inadvertently collected and analysed, potentially leading to spurious evidence being introduced into the criminal investigation. A series of experiments were undertaken to determine the extent to which an investigator could contribute to any DNA contamination of a scene of crime under different simulated activities. Further, the degree to which any contamination was reduced by the use of commercially available protective clothing was demonstrated. Precautions that should routinely be taken at a scene of crime to reduce the risk of DNA contamination are recommended.

[1]  R. V. Oorschot,et al.  DNA fingerprints from fingerprints , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Rachael R. E. Frazier,et al.  Validation of the applied biosystems Prism™ 377 automated sequencer for forensic short tandem repeat analysis , 1996, Electrophoresis.

[3]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[4]  P. Buffolino,et al.  An assessment of DNA contamination risks in New York City Medical Examiner facilities. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  G. N. Rutty,et al.  An investigation into the transference and survivability of human DNA following simulated manual strangulation with consideration of the problem of third party contamination , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[6]  Gillian Tully,et al.  The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[7]  R. Sparkes,et al.  Validation of the AMPFlSTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[8]  S. Yentis,et al.  The effect of facial hair and sex on the dispersal of bacteria below a masked subject , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[9]  Ha'eri Gb,et al.  The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using "tracer particles". , 1980 .

[10]  G. Rutty Human DNA contamination of mortuaries: does it matter? , 2000, The Journal of pathology.

[11]  A. M. Wiley,et al.  The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using "tracer particles". , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  G. N. Rutty,et al.  DNA contamination of mortuary instruments and work surfaces: a significant problem in forensic practice? , 2000, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[13]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[14]  Robert Schweizer MASK WIGGLING AS A POTENTIAL CAUSE OF WOUND CONTAMINATION , 1976, The Lancet.