Assessing effectiveness of a mature trauma system: Association of trauma center presence with lower injury mortality rate.

OBJECTIVE To determine effectiveness of trauma center care in a mature trauma system by comparing motor vehicle crash (MVC) death rates in counties with a trauma center (TC) to those without a trauma center (NTC). METHODS State data for MVCs occurring in 2003 were analyzed. Fatalities from crashes in counties with a TC were compared with NTC counties. The primary outcome was case-fatality rate and the secondary outcome was crash-fatality rate. Data from 67 Florida counties and 20 TCs were assessed. Covariates such as age, speed, alcohol use, prehospital resources, and rural/urban location were adjusted for in the analysis. RESULTS The statewide incidence of fatality from MVC in 2003 was 18.6 per 100,000. The overall state case-fatality rate was 2.8% (95% CI = 2.4-3.3). There were 13 TC counties with a mean fatality rate of 17.7 per 100,000 (95% CI = 14.5-20.9) and 54 NTC counties with a mean fatality rate 33.4 per 100,000 (95% CI = 28.8-38.0; p < 0.001). The case-fatality rate was 1.4% (95% CI = 1.1-1.7) in TC counties and 3.2% (95% CI = 2.7-3.7) in NTC counties (p < 0.001). Moreover, crash-fatality rate in TC counties and NTC counties was 1.4% (95% CI = 1.0-1.8) versus 3.3% (95% CI = 2.8-3.7) respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS TC counties had significantly lower MVC death rates than NTC counties. This association was independent of age, alcohol use, speed, rural/urban location, and prehospital resources.

[1]  Amado Alejandro Báez,et al.  System compliance with out-of-hospital trauma triage criteria. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Guohua Li,et al.  Trends in Arkansas Motorcycle Trauma After Helmet Law Repeal , 2005, Southern medical journal.

[3]  A. Peitzman,et al.  Trauma center maturation: quantification of process and outcome. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Elihu D Richter,et al.  Death and injury from motor vehicle crashes: a tale of two countries. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  N. Mann,et al.  Influence of trauma system implementation on process of care delivered to seriously injured patients in rural trauma centers. , 2001, Surgery.

[6]  Kobi Peleg,et al.  Increased survival among severe trauma patients: the impact of a national trauma system. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[7]  Kenneth W Kizer,et al.  Fractures in access to and assessment of trauma systems. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Quality of life after the trauma center. , 1987, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  W. Brady,et al.  Interhospital versus direct scene transfer of major trauma patients in a rural trauma system. , 1998, The American surgeon.

[10]  C. Cox,et al.  Effect of trauma system maturation on mortality rates in patients with blunt injuries in the Finger Lakes Region of New York State. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  Nathens Ab,et al.  The relationship between trauma center volume and outcome. , 2001 .

[12]  C. Cayten,et al.  Fatality Analysis Reporting System demonstrates association between trauma system initiatives and decreasing death rates. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  Lawrence J Cook,et al.  Effect of repeal of the national maximum speed limit law on occurrence of crashes, injury crashes, and fatal crashes on Utah highways. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Walter L Biffl,et al.  Transfer Times to Definitive Care Facilities Are Too Long: A Consequence of an Immature Trauma System , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[15]  R. Mullner,et al.  The Illinois Trauma System: changes in patient survival patterns following vehicular injuries. , 1977, JACEP.

[16]  F P Rivara,et al.  The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. , 2000, JAMA.

[17]  E. Richter Death and injury from motor vehicle crashes in Israel: epidemiology, prevention and control. , 1981, International Journal of Epidemiology.