Depth of Rock Damage from Strong Seismic Ground Motions near the 2004 Parkfield Mainshock

Changes in the S - P delay of repeating earthquakes near Parkfield, California, after strong shaking in the 2004 mainshock, occur at surface stations but not at borehole stations. This result indicates that rock damage occurs mainly in the upper few tens of meters in fractured rock with a low seismic velocity. In addition, changes in coda-primary delay are comparable to changes in S - P delay. This observation along with the lack of S - P delay changes at borehole stations yields a simple model for the coda. Direct waves pass through the shallow damaged layer once. Coda waves scatter or refract in the deep undamaged subsurface and hence also pass through the subsurface just once. The coda, however, contains some brief reverberations within the shallow subsurface where the additional path length scales to the thickness of the shallow layer. The coda-primary delay measured by correlation includes both the zero delay change of direct coda and the increased delay of reverberating coda. Published changes in Rayleigh-wave group velocity before and after the Parkfield mainshock are compatible with their main cause being from the shallow velocity changes inferred from repeating earthquakes but have little spatial resolution. Stacking of earthquake seismograms resolved surface reflections at one shallow (63 m deep) borehole station GHIB. A change in P -wave travel-time body of ∼8 msec was marginally resolved and is compatible with the repeating earthquake S - P delay changes. Autocorrelation passive seismology resolved ∼32 msec P -wave reverberation delay change above the 251 m deep borehole station CCRB.

[1]  C. Sammis,et al.  Dynamic Driving of Small Shallow Events during Strong Motion , 2009 .

[2]  Christoph Sens-Schönfelder,et al.  Sudden drop of seismic velocity after the 2004 Mw 6.6 mid-Niigata earthquake, Japan, observed with Passive Image Interferometry , 2009 .

[3]  N. Sleep,et al.  Nonlinear attenuation and rock damage during strong seismic ground motions , 2008 .

[4]  F. Brenguier,et al.  Postseismic Relaxation Along the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from Continuous Seismological Observations , 2008, Science.

[5]  Zhigang Peng,et al.  Dynamic triggering of high‐frequency bursts by strong motions during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake sequence , 2008 .

[6]  T. Teng,et al.  Dynamic Triggering by Strong-Motion P and S Waves: Evidence from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2008 .

[7]  T. Brocher Compressional and Shear-Wave Velocity versus Depth Relations for Common Rock Types in Northern California , 2008 .

[8]  James P. Evans,et al.  Mineralogic and Textural Analyses of Drill Cuttings from the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) Boreholes: Initial Interpretations of Fault Zone Composition and Constraints on Geologic Models , 2007 .

[9]  G. Beroza,et al.  Full waveform earthquake location : Application to seismic streaks on the Calaveras Fault, California , 2007 .

[10]  T. Nishimura,et al.  Temporal change in site response caused by earthquake strong motion as revealed from coda spectral ratio measurement , 2006 .

[11]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Three-Dimensional Compressional Wavespeed Model, Earthquake Relocations, and Focal Mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, Region , 2006 .

[12]  Y. Ben‐Zion,et al.  Temporal Changes of Shallow Seismic Velocity Around the Karadere-Düzce Branch of the North Anatolian Fault and Strong Ground Motion , 2006 .

[13]  G. Beroza,et al.  Depth constraints on nonlinear strong ground motion from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake , 2005 .

[14]  G. Beroza,et al.  Nonlinear strong ground motion in the ML 5.4 Chittenden earthquake: Evidence that preexisting damage increases susceptibility to further damage , 2004 .

[15]  G. Beroza,et al.  Evidence for Widespread Nonlinear Strong Ground Motion in the MW 6.9 Loma Prieta Earthquake , 2004 .

[16]  Antoine Guitton,et al.  Least-squares joint imaging of multiples and primaries , 2004 .

[17]  A. Elgamal,et al.  Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils , 2003 .

[18]  J. Vidale,et al.  Time functions of deep earthquakes from broadband and short‐period stacks , 1998 .

[19]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Polar observations of convection with northward interplanetary magnetic field at dayside high latitudes , 1998 .

[20]  G. Beroza,et al.  Source array analysis of coda waves near the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, mainshock: Implications for the mechanism of coseismic velocity changes , 1997 .

[21]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Nonlinearity, liquefaction, and velocity variation of soft soil layers in Port Island, Kobe, during the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[22]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Nonlinear Soil Response a Reality? , 2022 .

[23]  W. S. Harlan Separation of signal and noise applied to vertical seismic profiles , 1988 .

[24]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Signal/noise separation and velocity estimation , 1984 .

[25]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras Fault, California , 1984 .

[26]  W. Rodi,et al.  A fast, accurate method for computing group-velocity partial derivatives for Rayleigh and Love modes , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  K. E. Bullen,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology , 1964 .