Technology Adoption by Groups: A Valence Perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
Joseph S. Valacich | Saonee Sarker | Suprateek Sarker | Suprateek Sarker | J. Valacich | Saonee Sarker
[1] W ZmudRobert,et al. Information Technology Implementation Research , 1990 .
[2] Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al. Does Size Matter? An Investigation of Collaborative Information Technology Adoption by US Firms , 2003 .
[3] James Y. L. Thong,et al. An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[4] E. Mannix,et al. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .
[5] M. Markus. Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .
[6] Barry O'Neill,et al. The Group problem solving process : studies of a valence model , 1982 .
[7] Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al. The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .
[8] E.,et al. GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .
[9] Daniel Robey,et al. More on myth, magic and metaphor: Cultural insights into the management of information technology in organizations , 1999, Inf. Technol. People.
[10] Judy Bayer,et al. A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations , 1989, [1988] Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software track.
[11] Janet Fulk,et al. Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .
[12] James D. McKeen,et al. Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..
[13] L. Festinger. A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .
[14] Monica J. Garfield,et al. The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..
[15] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .
[16] Ritu Agarwal,et al. Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .
[17] Kenneth H. Price,et al. Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making , 1991 .
[18] Robert S. Baron,et al. Reaffirmation of Social Comparison Views of Choice Shifts: Averaging and Extremity Effects in an Autokinetic Situation , 1976 .
[19] R. Hirschheim,et al. Critical issues in information systems research , 1987 .
[20] J. Cockcroft. The process of technological innovation , 1965 .
[21] Raimo Tuomela,et al. Group beliefs , 2020, Synthese.
[22] John F. Rockart,et al. Editor’s comments , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.
[23] Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al. Handbook of communication and social interaction skills , 2003 .
[24] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[25] J. McGrath. Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.
[26] Suprateek Sarker,et al. Implications of space and time for distributed work: an interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[27] Erja Mustonen-Ollila,et al. How organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[28] B. Fisher. Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .
[29] Allen S. Lee,et al. Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .
[30] J. Thong,et al. CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .
[31] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .
[32] Marshall Scott Poole,et al. A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision‐making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions , 1982 .
[33] Peter Gyngell,et al. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology , 1994 .
[34] Amy E. Randel,et al. Understanding Group Efficacy , 2000 .
[35] Paul R. Yost,et al. Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.
[36] M. Scott Poole,et al. The Valence Model Unveiled: Critique and Alternative Formulation , 1981 .
[37] Kar Yan Tam,et al. Organizational adoption of open systems: a 'technology-push, need-pull' perspective , 2000, Inf. Manag..
[38] Lisa A. Keister,et al. Adapting to Radical Change: Strategy and Environment in Piece-Rate Adoption During China's Transition , 2002, Organ. Sci..
[39] Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al. Swiftness and Intensity of Administrative Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study of TQM in Information Systems , 2000, Decis. Sci..
[40] Izak Benbasat,et al. Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..
[41] Sherah Kurnia,et al. The need for a processual view of inter-organizational systems adoption , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..
[42] Izak Benbasat,et al. Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..
[43] John Thibaut,et al. Trade versus expropriation in open groups: A comparison of two types of social power. , 1983 .
[44] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..
[45] T. H. Kwon,et al. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .
[46] Gloria Mark,et al. Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration: Examining the "Space Between" , 2003, ECSCW.
[47] Nicholas S. Vonortas. The Process of Technological Innovation , 1997 .
[48] A. Delbecq,et al. Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness , 1971 .
[49] Izak Benbasat,et al. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..
[50] Graham Button,et al. Getting real about privacy and surveillance at work , 2002 .
[51] Gordon B. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..
[52] Dale E. Brashers,et al. Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument‐outcome link , 1998 .
[53] John K. Brilhart. Effective Group Discussion , 1974 .
[54] Detmar W. Straub,et al. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..
[55] L. Festinger. Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.
[56] V. Lai,et al. An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .
[57] Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton. Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .
[58] John A. Pearce,et al. A measure of ceo social power in strategic decision‐making , 1987 .
[59] David Budgen,et al. Software design , 2020, International computer science series.
[60] Morgan W. McCall,et al. Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership , 1982 .
[61] K. Weick. What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .
[62] Robert S. Baron,et al. Reaffirmation of social comparison views of choice shifts: Averaging and extremity effects in an autokinetic situation. , 1976 .
[63] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..
[64] Robert P. Bostrom,et al. The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[65] B. Bass. Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed. , 1990 .
[66] Donelson R. Forsyth,et al. Social Comparison and Influence in Groups , 2000 .
[67] Shoshana Zuboff,et al. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .
[68] Hoffman Lr,et al. Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups. II. Quality and acceptance as goals of leaders and members. , 1967 .
[69] Diane M. Strong,et al. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..
[70] Varun Grover,et al. Information technology innovations: general diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[71] M. E. Shaw. Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .
[72] Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al. Exploring the Application and Acceptance of Group Support Systems in Africa , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[73] Adam LeBrocq. Style Guide for the Journal of the Association for Information Systems , 2022 .
[74] R. Zmud,et al. Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .
[75] Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al. Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .
[76] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..
[77] Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al. Implementing New Manufacturing Technology: The Related Effects of Technology Characteristics and User Learning Activities , 2002 .
[78] A. Adam. Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .
[79] Paul S. Goodman,et al. Institutionalization of Planned Organizational Change , 1978 .
[80] Kar Yan Tam,et al. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..
[81] Dale Goodhue,et al. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..
[82] G. Walsham. Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .
[83] Mark G. Simkin,et al. The analysis and study of the impact of technology on groups: a conceptual framework , 1999 .
[84] Vincent S. Lai,et al. A model of ISDN (integrated services digital network) adoption in U.S. corporations , 1994, Inf. Manag..
[85] M. Markus,et al. Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .
[86] L. R. Hoffman,et al. Individual and Group in Group Problem Solving The Valence Model Redressed , 1994 .
[87] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.
[88] Dennis S. Gouran. COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR GROUP DECISION MAKING , 2003 .
[89] V. Sambamurthy,et al. Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..
[90] Fred D. Davis,et al. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.
[91] Deborah L. Wells,et al. Leadership and Ethics in Work Groups , 2002 .
[92] Rich Ling,et al. "We will be reached": the use of mobile telephony among Norwegian youth , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.
[93] A. Scupola,et al. The Adoption of Internet Commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: An Environmental, Technological and Organizational Perspective , 2003 .
[94] G. S. Sanders,et al. Is social comparison irrelevant for producing choice shifts , 1977 .
[95] Jr. French,et al. The disruption and cohesion of groups. , 1941 .
[96] J. R. French,et al. The bases of social power. , 1959 .
[97] Ronald E. Rice,et al. Computer-Mediated Communication System Network Data: Theoretical Concerns and Empirical Examples , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[98] Shoshana Zuboff. In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .
[99] Suprateek Sarker,et al. Understanding mobile handheld device use and adoption , 2003, CACM.
[100] H. P. Sims,et al. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .
[101] Peter A. Todd,et al. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..
[102] M. Lynne Markus,et al. Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .
[103] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.
[104] L. R. Hoffman,et al. VALENCE IN THE ADOPTION OF SOLUTIONS BY PROBLEM-SOLVING GROUPS: CONCEPT, METHOD, AND RESULTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.